Participating Frequently

Question

Reduce the size of tiff files

Forum|Forum|13 years ago
July 3, 2012
3 replies
51286 views

Hi,

I have a question about the size of tiff files.

I start with RAW (NEF) photos from my Nikon D800. These files generally import at around 40MB each and I am using Lightroom 4 to keep track of them.

I'll use Lightroom's "Edit in PS" functionality, make a bunch of edits to the file in CS6, flatten all the layers, and then save the file (as a tiff).

The original NEF file was ~40MB but the new tiff file (in this specific example) is over 200MB!

Am I doing something wrong? How can I get the file back to a reasonable size for storage? I don't want to have to save it as a jpg - I want to keep as much information as I can.

Thank you for any pointers!

RJ

This topic has been closed for replies.

JJMack

Community Expert

You need to learn about image file formats. Some have capabilites that others do not. What requires the most data in an image file is Pixel information. Pixel data vary with image mode Gratscale, RGB, CMKK, mapped color, Color depth. Pixel data size varies greatly in size and some formats support compress and uncompressed pixel data. Some file formats also support layers layered files have pixels for all raster type layers. Image files may have meta data. Tiff supports layers 16bit color depth compresses and uncompressed. Tiff will vary greatly in size.

JJMack

R

RobertJosephAuthor

Participating Frequently

Thanks everyone.

JJMack, It isn't a lack of knowledge of file formats (I am a software engineer on the iPhone team at Apple) - it is a TOTAL lack of knowledge about Photoshop (I am doing something wrong with the transition between LR 4 and CS6 because if I export as TIFF from LR 4 (or do a "Save as..." in CS6 (as conroy suggested)), the resulting tiff's file size is almost exactly what I'd expect.

I'll keep looking into this.

Thank you for all of the help!

RJ

C

charles badland

Inspiring

Robert,

Keep in mind Raw (NEF) files only contain data of one color (R, G or B) per sample point (what will become a pixel). Compare to the pixels in a TIFF file that contain three colors (R, G and B) per pixel.

So as, Noel says, Raw files tend to be smaller.

Also, did you try saving TIFF with a lossless compression, like LZW?

Noel Carboni

Legend

You're doing nothing wrong necessarily. Raw files in general are expected to be smaller than a rendered result.

Are you saving your master file as TIFF instead of PSD for a particular reason? PSD has arguably more effective data compression, especially if you choose to disable the "Maximize Compatibility of PSD and PSB Files" setting.

-Noel

conroy

Participating Frequently

Maybe the NEF are compressed and you have compression set to "none" in the TIFF save options dialogue. What are the image dimensions in pixels and what is the bit-depth of the TIFF that you save?

R

RobertJosephAuthor

Participating Frequently

Hi,

Thank you very much for the reply!

The image dimensions are 7360x4912 (again, the D800 is 32 MP, so the files are big.

Because I am opening the file from Lightroom, all I do in CS6 is choose "Save" (not "Save as...") so I am not prompted to choose the compression options. Do you know where I can modify that setting?

Thank you so much!

RJ

conroy

Participating Frequently

Uncompressed 16 bits per channel RGB will need 6 bytes per pixel, so there's approximately 200 MB for 32 MP. If you have a Mac, Finder will tell you 217 MB because it uses M to represent 1 million, not 2 to the power of 20.

Do File > Save As..., pick format TIFF, change the filename if you want, click Save. You will be presented with a dialogue of TIFF options. The first section is compression.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded