Why doesn't PPI and Image dimensions directly correlate?
I've done a lot of research on ppi and image dimensions and find unclear answers all over the place. My question is, if you have an image with a set size, for example, 3000 x 2000 pixels, shouldn't the ppi be determined by the size of that image? I don't understand why when I export an image from lightroom or photoshop, regardless of the image dimensions, they all export at 240 ppi. If an image is exported at 3000 x 2000 pixels, there should be a set ppi density at that size, and the ppi should change for every different dimension, am I not correct? The main reason why I am asking is because I have a large flatbed printer I am about to blow up some prints on, and I want to make sure I get the best resolution out of these images. This particular printer prints up to 2400 dpi and I want to make sure I'm getting the most out of it. I just want to know if it will make a difference when printing an image from a file that reads 240 dpi or 2400 dpi, even though I feel like the dpi should always stay constant at a set resolution.

