Is there a way to report AI generated content being passed off as actual photos?

[CyborgHuskies]

I'm just looking for images I can use as general anatomy practice while drawing, and I found this abomination (file number 677462298). I always exclude AI generated images and look for photos, and I immediately knew it was AI because horses do not move like that. It's a biomechanical impossibility. There is no option to report trash like this on the preview page, I looked through the support pages, and the only directions I got from Google - which, btw, are better than what your site gave me, Adobe - were to the forums. Now, I'd've much rather have just submitted a report and called it good, but you left me with no other option than going public with my grievances. Do better, Adobe.

[Abambo]

Google is right. Report it here. You did it, and when @Contributor1 sees this, he will chime in and check the situation. 

[Abambo]

And yes, there are some horrible errors in this asset:

The more I look, the more I see!

[Jill_C]

Adobe doesn't make it too easy to report questionable images, presumably to prevent bad actors from acting with malice to get other Contributors taken down. Nevertheless, they should provide a Buyer with a verified, active Subscription a simple way of indicating that a flawed image needs to be reviewed and removed. Buyer's opinions and Buyer satisfaction is important to Adobe, and they react quickly when an issue is reported here.

[Contributor1]

Hello @CyborgHuskies, I see the issue you're referencing and I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

[37399144g3ef]

Similar story here. I was filtering to exclude generative AI, but one of my search results showcased a video where the individuals float 'Scooby-Doo' style across the floor, one disappearing into nothingness, and the other person walking sideways into a wall: #806682883 

I see there are other threads here that also reference this issue but the conversations have since been locked:

• How to report stock images that are clearly AI generated but not tagged as such?
• AI Generated Images Not Marked as Such?

Users need a method to flag items that are AI generated. From a developer standpoint, the easiest method might be to add an option under the "Report" button: "Content may contain AI Generated Content" > "Flag this content for AI Generated Content Review" or something similar.

I understand that it's not the same form for Reporting Infringement, but some of these instances may be as simple as sending a message to the creator: "This was flagged as AI Generated, would you like to update the tag on your content?" Maybe a user has forgotten to tag it properly, and pushing a notification to the original uploader would be an easy method to try and correct some of this. If a multitude of flags go up on a particular user, then maybe at that point it prompts Adobe employee manual review.

This is a time where we're in flux while learning how to interact with this content, but giving your users some method to consolidate feedback would go a long way.

[Jill_C]

This particular image shouldn't have been accepted at all - the motion of the person walking backwards down the aisle then disappearing into the wall doesn't even make sense...

[37399144g3ef]

Hi @Contributor1, I wanted to follow up on this thread and the message I left. Can you provide a status update please? 

[Contributor1]

Hello @37399144g3ef , sorry I missed your post earlier. I'm hopeful we will someday add a GenAI reporting option as you mentioned. I've sent the details of video 806682883 missing a GenAI tag to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the search filter.

[DylanRidley]

More here 827596544 

This is quite honestly ridiculous, if Adobe are happy for AI "artists" to fill their site with 100 pages of AI generated garbage we need to at least be able to easily report people that aren't tagging it properly. Its only going to get harder to spot AI images and I don't want to be supporting someone typing a sentence into AI then trying to pass it off as human work instead of artists who put actual passion into their craft.

[37399144g3ef]

Even the example Dylan referenced ( 827596544 ) is a User title "AI-Stocks". Generally it looks like they have labeled their content AI but things like this are getting missed and falling through the cracks. 

@Contributor1 for visibility, again I think the idea is if there's AI content it needs to be tagged properly. Can you maybe give us some guidance here? Or is tagging in these threads currently the best method for Users to flag?

[Contributor1]

Hello @DylanRidley, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Hello @37399144g3ef, yes tagging in these threads currently the best method for Users to flag. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

[37399144g3ef]

Hi @Contributor1,
I ran into another clip when using the "exclude generative" filter: https://stock.adobe.com/video/a-digital-generated-female-robotics-scientist-and-her-advanced-ai-com...

[Contributor1]

Hello @37399144g3ef, I've sent the details of video 610467421 missing a GenAI tag to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the video.

[oleschwander]

I'm afraid Adobe has opened Pandora's Box.

[DylanRidley]

Not quite Pandora's Box unfortunately. At least the last thing out that box was hope— seems as though we can't even be afforded that. Does anyone know of any stock sites with a zero tolerance policy for AI generated images?

[37399144g3ef]

Hi @Contributor1, this came up while using "exclude generative":
https://stock.adobe.com/video/ai-assistant-says-access-denied-please-try-again-later/584807077 

[Contributor1]

Hello @37399144g3ef, I've sent the details of video 584807077 missing a GenAI tag to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the video.