How to report stock images that are clearly AI generated but not tagged as such?

[defaultzfh95oldqm9j]

I routinely find images that are clearly generated by AI image generators, but there is no indication in the description that they are. Generally it's missing fingers, or lighting or something else that gives it away, but my concern is that Adobe's team is not filtering all of these images well enough. I definitely see value in AI images, but I don't want to be downloading something that I think is a real image, when it is not. This is misleading at the least. 

Example https://stock.adobe.com/images/santa-cooking/550542006?prev_url=detail

[Abambo]

It is probable that these pictures were uploaded before the instructions for generative AI assets were published. This said, the asset also has quality problems (eg. hands) that should be checked.

Edit: report them here. That is the correct place, especially if they have quality issues.

I suppose @Contributor1 will comment on this.

[Contributor1]

Hello, thank you for the report we appreciate the feedback. We are constantly evaluating our collection looking for ways to improve. I've recently sent a request to the search team for an AI generated filter from similar discussions.

[Abambo]

The suggestion for now is to use “-AI” in the search terms. That helps as long as the contributors obey the rules, that were published on December 5th. Those rules ask for an “AI” keyword and for “Generative AI” as part of the title.

[DeltaDelta010101]

can you check if these are AI images?

like this one: 559953430

This contributorАнастасия Птицова has published a huge series of slight variationsof the same image, none tagged as AI and most def look and feel like it.

TBH the time investment to find nice quality images for fantasy works on Adobe Stock is too high at the moment because of "art" like this.  

[DeltaDelta010101]

here is another example, if you look at the right hand and the red blade by the hip: 557776270 

@Abambo has anyone considered allowing artists who really draw to tag that (handmade, or made by a human) instead of asking AI generators to mark their word. I think the incentive for artists who draw by hand is different?

[Abambo]

@Abambo has anyone considered allowing artists who really draw to tag that (handmade, or made by a human) instead of asking AI generators to mark their word. I think the incentive for artists who draw by hand is different?

By @DeltaDelta010101

Artists are allowed to put in any (reasonable) keyword and title. Generative AI is required to put in specific keywords, allowing to filter for those assets or filter out those assets.

But there is, to my knowledge, no recommendation for standard craft artists.

[Abambo]

Can monsters also have monster-like hands? I assume from this picture that the series is generative AI.