3D Image rejected claiming generative AI

[roberto25924244x86i]

I don't think it's too hard to distinguish a 3D render image from a generative AI, although this was the given reason for rejecting my resource. What do you guys think?

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

It's a pain, but best way to get it properly reviewed would be to submit a property release along with the asset. The release will contain a placeholder for the image of your wireframe, while also testifying that the creator and owner of the work.

[roberto25924244x86i]

Gosh! One more step to the boring process to sub an image, but easier than a future dispute process. Thanks for your comment. 

[daniellei4510]

There's actually no dispute process. Moderators' decisions are final. I only know of one instance where a dispute was even taken into consideration and, if I remember correctly, it involved the moderator seeing a glitch is a video submission (or submissions) that was/weren't actually there, but was due to an issue with the moderator's computer. Or something to that effect. 

[roberto25924244x86i]

So, if I got what you said, I have to submit the asset again including a release? Is it?

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

Correct. If I recall how if works (AI contributors once had to create a property release for every asset submitted), after you click "Yes" when asked if the asset has recognizable people or property, you will be able to download a property release in PDF format. Fill it out, with you as the owner and creator of the asset, and place with the actual image or wireframe image into the placeholder and submit it along with the asset.

[roberto25924244x86i]

Many Thanks. You helped me a lot.

[daniellei4510]

No problem! Good luck.

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @roberto25924244x86i ,

It does happen sometimes whereby the reviewer error in refusing for the incorrect category. I had an instance whereby my photo was refused as an AI. I do not submit AI images. I also had an instance whereby a file that I had release attached to was refused as having no release. I had to detach the release and reattach it to resubmit it. So, there is a lot of these errors that are going on and it's a pain to get them correct without resubmission. 

In any case, there are artworks that require property releases. So it is not unusual for a contributor to create his own original work and attach a release to it. In your case following @daniellei4510 suggestion to prepare and attach a property release to say you are the owner would be the safest way to get your files properly reviewed/accepted.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[roberto25924244x86i]

Hi  Jacquelin. Thanks for advices. I've never attached a release before. I hope the reason  for rejection is correct, if not, it makes no sense I resend it. I was reading the instructions to fill the release form and at some point it asks me to "attach property visual" (as attached image down bellow). There´s no this option on instructions and I don't know what to attach here. By clicking the button you are allowed to attach a JPEG file. Is it the image of my resource? Or the proof I am the image owner (In my case, the wireframe image)? In her 1st answer Danielle refers to a placeholder for my wireframe image. Is this? Do you know? It's a bit confuse for my 1st time.
Thank you.

[Abambo]

Attach the asset that you submit. Don't forget to state that it is a 3D render from Cinema4D. 

It may well be that the refusal reason is a quality issue. But you can't know, without resubmitting. (Well, you could check the asset at 100% for rendering errors.)

[roberto25924244x86i]

Thanks. Already did that. Praying now! 🙂

[Abambo]

Good luck.

[roberto25924244x86i]

Just to let you know, I contacted AS and they replied. They are going to check the image again.

[daniellei4510]

Good to know.

[Abambo]

Just to let you know, I contacted AS and they replied. They are going to check the image again.

By @roberto25924244x86i

Good luck (again).