Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Könnt ihr meine Reportage zum Hurrikan "Fiona" in 2022 bitte auch mal bewerten? Sie wurden von Adobe Bildredakteuren nicht akzeptiert (Qualitätsmängel) und ich habe nicht die geringste Ahnung, wieso!?!?!
Danke im Voraus.
Trees are never big sellers, even when the quality is visually & technically perfect.
These are snapshots of random splintered and fallen trees. An insurance adjuster might like them but beyond that, I don't see much here of commercial interest.
Stock customers want professional images for use in commercial projects like posters, TV commercials, magazines, & merchandise. If you were the customer, what would you buy these for? Read these links.
...1. not in sharp focus
2. underexposed shadows
3. underexposed shadows, chromatic aberration
4. blurry, chromatic aberration, white balance issue
5. same as #1 at slightly different angle
These all appear to be snapshots straight out of the camera with no editing. ALL images require at least a minimal amount of editing before uploading to Adobe Stock.
I agree with @Nancy OShea that these would have minimal commercial appeal.
The first photo lacks contrast, is slightly over exposed and not shrp. There are IP issues due to the names on the tombstones. Also, I do not think there is a commerical value.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Trees are never big sellers, even when the quality is visually & technically perfect.
These are snapshots of random splintered and fallen trees. An insurance adjuster might like them but beyond that, I don't see much here of commercial interest.
Stock customers want professional images for use in commercial projects like posters, TV commercials, magazines, & merchandise. If you were the customer, what would you buy these for? Read these links.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
1. not in sharp focus
2. underexposed shadows
3. underexposed shadows, chromatic aberration
4. blurry, chromatic aberration, white balance issue
5. same as #1 at slightly different angle
These all appear to be snapshots straight out of the camera with no editing. ALL images require at least a minimal amount of editing before uploading to Adobe Stock.
I agree with @Nancy OShea that these would have minimal commercial appeal.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The first photo lacks contrast, is slightly over exposed and not shrp. There are IP issues due to the names on the tombstones. Also, I do not think there is a commerical value.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Bilder wie diese sind nur aktuell wertvoll, für die Tageszeitung. Eine Woche später hat niemand mehr Interesse an umgefallenen Bäumen. Das wäre anders, würde man Bergungsaktivitäten sehen. Aber auch dann müssen die Bilder technisch in Ordnung sein. @Jill_C hat hier die gröbsten Fehler benannt.
@RALPH_L hat auch einen guten Einwand mit den Namen. Panoramafreiheit gibt es bei Adobe Stock nicht.