Copy link to clipboard
Copied
For the guy in the green coat, the hair could be cleaned up and the face in general doesn't look photorealistic..
The guy in the helmet, the face has the often typical plastic feel and the irises are poorly rendered.
On the train, the lettering needs to be removed.
The reason is quality issues, not excessive noise. Indeed, there is no noise in this picture, because it has been denoised to death:
There is no structure, no detail left over.
You have compression artefacts, and the zipper is incorrectly rendered:
I would edit out all those fake logos. They are low quality and may generate even IP refusals.
The train shows many artefacts, like the aliasing here:
You also see fake writing and artefacts in that:
You see many other errors in those pic
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
For the guy in the green coat, the hair could be cleaned up and the face in general doesn't look photorealistic..
The guy in the helmet, the face has the often typical plastic feel and the irises are poorly rendered.
On the train, the lettering needs to be removed.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
And as I always recommend, running portraits through facial restoration software can be of help. But there are still some rendering issues here, such as the helmet strap.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In the third image, the gibberish text should be removed.
in the second image, the collar isn't rendered correctly. There's no opening at the neck.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Aside from your question about noise, all three of those faux logos need to be removed if you want to sell these images via AS.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you for your answers. The truth is that sometimes people tend to rely too much on the AI, but it is not perfect and still makes many mistakes.
Regards
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It happened to my images as well. It seems that Adobe just uses whatever excuse to stop accepting AI generated images. If Adobe outlines the specific quality of AI generated images it accepts, it will be better help contributors understand the standard instead of wasting time to submit it. Very frustrated.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Do you have any idea how much the moderation process would slow down if moderators gave you a reason for every image they rejected? That is not their job. Adobe welcomes QUALITY AI generated images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Adobe adds well over half a million AI images to the database every week; therefore, your assertion that they use any excuse to stop accepting AI is demonstrably false. If you upload a few of your rejected images here, the community members will help you to understand what the rejection reasons are.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It happened to my images as well. It seems that Adobe just uses whatever excuse to stop accepting AI generated images. If Adobe outlines the specific quality of AI generated images it accepts, it will be better help contributors understand the standard instead of wasting time to submit it. Very frustrated.
By @WP98560
You seem not to check the assets as posted here, or you would know that they have been refused for reason. As a buyer, it's frustrating to look at tons of bad assets, before finding one that may be good, just to see after licensing that it is still full of issues. Adobe outlines the quality requirements, but it looks like you did not read them. As a contributor, you are supposed to submit only perfect pictures. All the rest is frustrating. There are much too less refusals with generative AI. You just need to check random assets in the database. As a customer, I'm paying for this, you have better to improve.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The reason is quality issues, not excessive noise. Indeed, there is no noise in this picture, because it has been denoised to death:
There is no structure, no detail left over.
You have compression artefacts, and the zipper is incorrectly rendered:
I would edit out all those fake logos. They are low quality and may generate even IP refusals.
The train shows many artefacts, like the aliasing here:
You also see fake writing and artefacts in that:
You see many other errors in those pictures. You really need to check your pictures at 100%.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you submit the first and second ones as Photos? Because they are not photorealistic. People do not look like that, with overly smooth skin. The first one...why two zippers that don't really look like zippers? For the second, lose the logo. For the third one, lose the logo on the front at the very least, although there may be other issues. Are those "doors" open or closed?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Mmmm all I can say its old style of AI + small problems everywhere.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The main question you need to ask yourself is why a customer would choose to purchase AI generated images, which never look quite right, of everday subjects when Adobe stock has millions of similar images created using real subjects. I love creating AI image but always try to create something that is unique or at least could not be found as a photograph.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
100% agree .......