Apple, armored door and Electricity plug . Pictures for example.....Why are all my photos rejected?

[AndromidA]

[Test Screen Name]

Adobe gave you a reason why they rejected each one. For example, artefacts, general quality, intellectual property, not suitable, too many already. What did they say for each picture?

[AndromidA]

Adobe did not give me any reason to reject the photos, but the photos were accepted on other selling sites

[Test Screen Name]

Yes, Adobe DID give you a reason. Please check again, more carefully.

[Jill_C]

Yes they did. If you click on "not accepted" under the "uploaded files" link in your stock dashboard and then click on the rejected images above you will see the rejection reason.

[Abambo]

Adobe tells you, why they don't accept the asset.

Like:

Mostly it's because of quality issues. I recommend you read the instructions. Having pictures accepted elsewhere is no guaranty that they get accepted here, and vice versa. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[AndromidA]

I'm new here, but the topic is completely different from Shutterstock.... 

All my photos are rejected because of my quality issues

[Test Screen Name]

Thank you. So "quality issues" is the reason for rejecting. If you post more pictures in future, including that information for each picture will help us to help you.

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

1. Unfocused, underexposed, noisy and poorly composed. It's difficult to tell what it is...

2. poorly lit, unfocused, odd color

3. Color noise. I would also question the commercial appeal 

[AndromidA]

thx

[Henrik Heigl]

Hi,

it seems that all images are to dark and to unfocused as mentioned.

Also before you submit, please review the submission guidelines carefully and compare your work with other Stock inventory. To be accepted, your work should be as good or better than what's already represented in your keyword category.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Hope that helps.

[AndromidA]

This helped a lot, thank you bro

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

Photo 1: underexposed, out of focus, vertical lines not straitght, garbage at the bottom.

Photo 2: focus, overexposed highlights.

Photo 3: poorly cropped, sensor spots.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

The door:

Out of focus and noise artefacts:

The asset is highly underexposed as shown with the histogram:

There are no highlights and consequently no whites in this picture.

I would question here the commercial appeal.

Apple: slightly underexposed, the white balance is off. The DOF is very narrow. A little more apple in focus would have been better. It's a nice picture, I love it, but for stock it would need to be better.

The plug: wrong colour profile (should be sRGB), too cool, artefacts, I suppose there were some bad editing errors:

I may add as a minor error, the cropping of the mirrored image. You should have taken the whole mirrored plug. The sensor spots need to be corrected.

I love the concept of the plug. And all in all, it's a nice picture.

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

Regarding the apple photo, it is best practice when uploading for stock not to add filters to the photo.

Buyers can add their own effect.

[Jill_C]

SPAM !

[ricky336]

Post marked as spam and is removed.