Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In December, I submitted this file to Adobe Stock. It was rejected in January. I would like some advice on how to improve it.
We really need to see the full-sized version as submitted to see the reasons it was rejected. Also, please provide the header of the reason given for rejection (Quality Issues, Technical Issues, etc.).
It's blurry and poorly lit, and I question whether it has any commercial appeal.
Hello,
What is the purpose of these boots? What commercial use can they be used for - selling boots?
The thumbnail is too small to give concrete advice to improve the photo. However, composition is one thing here. It's not very good.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
We really need to see the full-sized version as submitted to see the reasons it was rejected. Also, please provide the header of the reason given for rejection (Quality Issues, Technical Issues, etc.).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It's blurry and poorly lit, and I question whether it has any commercial appeal.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
What is the purpose of these boots? What commercial use can they be used for - selling boots?
The thumbnail is too small to give concrete advice to improve the photo. However, composition is one thing here. It's not very good.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @default0aswsy1zylo2 ,
Nice boots. The composition is good. What you submit here is too small for us to give total assessment. You need to post the file as submitted to Adobe. However, from what I see here, I believe you got a "Quality" refusal. it is too cool, possibly slightly underexposed and not in sharp focus. It also appears to be noisy.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Whoever made those boots might object to them being used for commercial purposes (design patent, IP violation...).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think its joke))
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I would submit a bigger picture! To check the issues in your file, you need to post here the picture at the size and the quality as submitted.
At a first sight, I would guess that the exposure is incorrect.