Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I've figured out Shutterstock and am trying to expand to Adobe. I realize the quality expectations are different for different stock sites, but I can't seem to nail down what the biggest issues are with my images not being accepted. There doesn't seem to be a rhyme or reason as to why some are accepted and not others, other than for "Quality" issues. I am using my Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra phone camera. So, maybe my camera settings need fine-tuning? Or is it my composition, etc? Please share your tips, I'm new to this stock photo gig! Attached are several that didn't make the cut. THANKS! 🙂
The horse is too closely cropped. The horizon is slanted in the example below. I don't think your phone is capturing the detail Adobe looks for when it comes to stock. Viewed at 200%, details become kind of mushy is some areas, and I personally feel that if a buyer should want to enlarge an asset, details should still hold up to some extent. The barn with saddles, for example. There are burned out highlights (that might be recoverable), but it also seems to scream to be a horizontal image rather
...This blocky look, and the general lack of detail, is usually what makes images from small sensir cameras, I.e. phone cameras, unacceptable for stock. The image also has chroma noise in the sky.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The horse is too closely cropped. The horizon is slanted in the example below. I don't think your phone is capturing the detail Adobe looks for when it comes to stock. Viewed at 200%, details become kind of mushy is some areas, and I personally feel that if a buyer should want to enlarge an asset, details should still hold up to some extent. The barn with saddles, for example. There are burned out highlights (that might be recoverable), but it also seems to scream to be a horizontal image rather than vertical. And you're correct. Shutterstock's buyers are different from Adobe's buyers, who are largely corporations and businesses looking for extremely high-quality assets pertaining to same. Phone images DO get excepted here, but I think it's relatively rare in comparison to images taken with actual cameras.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Great feedback! I appreciate you, and I'm learning a lot! THANKS for taking the time to help 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Happy to be of help. Good luck!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
20240721_133609: Poorly cropped and slanted.
20250614_154830: slanted and too little depth-of-field.
20250613_173042: focus too shallow and oversaturated.
20250722_215328: underexposed.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Perfect, just what I needed to know. THANKS! 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This blocky look, and the general lack of detail, is usually what makes images from small sensir cameras, I.e. phone cameras, unacceptable for stock. The image also has chroma noise in the sky.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is what you're competing with in Stock inventory. This is bold & dramatic photography worthy of commercial use.
If you're serious about becoming a Stock photographer,
1. Enroll in some photography courses to learn the basics.
2. Join a photography club for practice & feedback.
3. Start saving for a good entry-level camera (new or used) + lenses & tripod.
Hope that helps.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
THANKS! I'm not too serious; I'm just doing it for fun as a hobby. 🙂 The feedback I've gotten here has been super helpful.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Even though you may not be too serious, you could read more about composition. In order to get sales, your photos need to have something!
A 'wow' factor. Composition can help to get this.
Composition:
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/photo-composition.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks much! 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm just doing it for fun as a hobby. 🙂
By @Mountain Girl Forsch
As a lot of us do. However, the users of the stock databases are professionals and expect professional quality. From my experience, Adobe is more stringent with photography in terms of quality than most of the other stock sites.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I agree, I have the same problem, wondering if even though there are guidelines, that maybe it depends on the moderator? Sometimes one day most will be accepted, another day most will be rejected. (usually for "quality"). I have been shocked by what's been accepted vs. rejected, so I submit things I have NO idea how they'll do, just because it IS so unpredictable! I really like that last shot of yours.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That truly was the crux of my question! There is no rhyme or reason! Thank you for your comment, and I'm happy to know that I'm not the only one experiencing inconsistencies. Happy day to you!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Happy day to you as well, and best of luck to you! I'm new here as well. We will learn the ropes!:)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Submissions are rarely reviewed by the same people each time. Assets are randomly assigned to reviewers.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now