3 Correct answers
Hi @maria elisa23947515bib4 , I take from your comments that these were rejected for IP (Intellectual Property) violations or missing model releases. Anytime people are recognisable in a photo a model release is required for each person in the photo. A property release is required for any logo, business name (e.g. Chevrolet - for which you will never get a release), copyrighted design (such as a cruise ship that the owners would recognise their floral design on the side of the ship even if it
...
Hola,
Estas fotos es muy bien. Me gusta.
The motion blur is a very good idea, but the subject is also blurred. The subject ideally should be sharp. It is likely that they will be rejected due to a lack of sharpess. Also, IP problems may occur. The cars in Cuba are iconic.
What was the rejection reason given?
In just one photo
This driver will know HIMSELF in the picture. He will know his route, his cart, his horse, his shirt.
The woman with the unbrella will know HERSELF from her face, glasses, clothes and umbrellas.
There are more people in the picture too who might know themselves.
All these people could sue Adobe and Adobe could sue you. But they have protected you, which is good.
In general, it is very difficult to take stock pictures in the street. Too many people, too many products, too many sign
...
11
Replies
In just one photo
This driver will know HIMSELF in the picture. He will know his route, his cart, his horse, his shirt.
The woman with the unbrella will know HERSELF from her face, glasses, clothes and umbrellas.
There are more people in the picture too who might know themselves.
All these people could sue Adobe and Adobe could sue you. But they have protected you, which is good.
In general, it is very difficult to take stock pictures in the street. Too many people, too many products, too many signs.
Hola, Elisa:
Veamos el 0973 porque es una buena imagen.
Hay mucho ruido, que necesita ser corregido (los extractos están al 100%):
Tienes aberración cromática, que necesita ser corregida:
La nitidez está bien, pero podría tener un poco de empuje.
La exposición es buena, el histograma está equilibrado.
La imagen parece una foto HDR, lo que está bien, pero algunos defectos como el ruido y la aberración cromática se refuerzan. Su procesamiento, sin embargo, es impresionante.
Supongamos que ha pasado la prueba de los "problemas técnicos" y que está bien desde ese punto de vista. Todavía le queda trabajo por hacer:
- El controlador tiene que proporcionar una liberación del modelo
- Es necesario que se hagan con photoshop todos los logotipos y marcas comerciales:
- El cartel del taxi es genérico, eso puede quedarse:
- La gente de aquí no puede ser reconocida, no es necesaria la liberación del modelo:
Tendrá que comprobar cada foto así, sólo para decidir, qué correcciones deben aplicarse. La moderación no tiene piedad con los defectos, porque los compradores potenciales necesitan obtener fotos impecables por su dinero.
Al pedir consejo, sería bueno, no publicar demasiadas fotos aquí, y darnos la razón de rechazo que el moderador le dio. Normalmente, una o dos fotos serían suficientes. Si todavía necesitas ayuda, puedes publicar otra foto con los defectos que no hayas visto.
Si es la primera vez que se introduce en el stock, debería tener en cuenta estos recursos: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html. Lea el manual de usuario del colaborador para obtener más información sobre las contribuciones al stock de Adobe: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html. Consulte aquí los motivos de rechazo: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html y, especialmente, las cuestiones técnicas y de calidad: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html.
AdChoices
