hi this was rejected for issues, can you elaborate

[Cynth963]

File ID: 555514608

Original name: 1.png

File ID: 555519363

Original name: 2.png

thank you 🙂

[Jill_C]

We cannot look into your account to view rejected images. Please post those 2 here in full size if you wish to receive feedback.

[Cynth963]

[Jill_C]

Is this a Generative AI image? If so, you must follow all of the requirements and guidelines shown on this help page:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html

There is a quite noticeable blown out hot spot on the left that needs to be fixed.

[Cynth963]

any feedback will help 🙂 thank you so much

[Cynth963]

i did notice i upscaled a bit more more than normal, could that might have been issue, trying to figure out what is "best size"  🙂

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

i did notice i upscaled a bit more more than normal, could that might have been issue, trying to figure out what is "best size"  🙂

By @Cynth963

Upsizing may create the effects I have described here: unsharp objects, sharpening artefacts

You should render at the target size. See the size limits and decide what render size fits your work best. Do not upscale. That does not enhance your file.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Cynth963]

thank you! 🙂

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Your asset is not very sharp and underexposed. Despite not being very sharp, you have sharpening artefacts.

As this a 3D render, you should opt for a transparent background, making your asset more versatile.

[Cynth963]

this helps a lot- danka 🙂

[Abambo]

You're welcome.

[Cynth963]

🙂

[Cynth963]

👋 hi! quick question , if u can or if anyone  can better direct me, I've have images uploaded,  at 2 different  prices.. .25cents and .75cents what determines the price scale. Is it image size, rarity, ect... I've been looking..

😊 thank you

[Jill_C]

Images do not have a set price. The price, and therefore the royalty that you earn, is determined by the Buyer's Stock Subscription.

https://stock.adobe.com/plans

[Cynth963]

Thank you Jill 😊  I'm obv new to this community. So then what determines the regular image downloads vs the premium.  

If I may ask xx

[Abambo]

Premium is on invitation only. That's all. From a customer point of view, you have Premium images and they are more expensive. From your point of view, you probably get more royalties, if you have a sale, but you will have less sales, so the image needs to have something that gives the buyer added value.

[Abambo]

Look here for your royalties: https://contributor.stock.adobe.com/royalties

[Cynth963]

thank ou guys!! another quick question, i have to provite a property release/ model release for a st of images i generated using AI. not illustraions, do i have to do a property release for each image of can i do a screen shot of entire set to reflect -to release. they images are not acual models, bt rather mathematical equations, 🙂 thank you guys!! 🙂

[Abambo]

You need to provide a property release for each set of images. If the moderator can appreciate the model release, you will not need a different model release for each image. They are Illustrations and you will need to mark them as AI according to the rules. announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content 

[Cynth963]

Thank you. Yes. Totally agree,  ai is ai. 

And I probably overstated it was ai, just to make sure.

Question. If I  my own face to generate an image, do I need to sign a model release for myself and include, or is "self" included in property. 

🙂

[Cynth963]

=use (my own face) as a base

[Abambo]

If you used a model for generating the asset, you need a model release. If you are the model, you sign the model release as the photographer and the model. You can generate your model release via the electronic signature, if you do not submit to other sites. If you submit to other sites, use the “paper” release, as that gets accepted by other sites too.

[Cynth963]

Thank you so much.  That answers all my questions.

For now, it it just content in need of property release. 😌  thank you again for all your insight. 

You have been very helpful. 

Cheers! 

[Abambo]

You're welcome.

(FYI: I corrected the typo and deleted the follow-up post)

[Cynth963]

Thank u 8)8)