Illustration: Quality issue...

[SnouWmen]

I don't know how well that might work, but I'll try to pause in case the portal closes after a while and the works start being reviewed by another moderator! 🙂 but that's just a guess.

[Jill_C]

You're still stuck on the idea that there's a lazy, incompetent moderator that maliciously rejects all assets for no reason at all... The Adobe moderation team reviews probably about a million assets each week. We don't know how large the moderation team is, but there might be up to a hundred moderators. Do you really think that you'd be so unlucky as to have that "lazy moderator" reviewing your assets each time? 

[SnouWmen]

There is a feeling that each moderator is given a list of specific authors whom he must check.
But it's just a feeling )

[Jill_C]

That is your own (paranoid) feeling. There is absolutely no evidence to support that premise. There are tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Contributors to Adobe Stock. We do not each get our own personally assigned Moderator.

[SnouWmen]

Do I insist that my feeling is universal?
But there's plenty of evidence, nonetheless!
Or should I say, reason to believe!
And the accusation of paranoia, is that your polite tone overflowing with respect?

[Abambo]

But there's plenty of evidence, nonetheless!

By @SnouWmen

There is no evidence. If your bad assets got accepted previously, it was by error.

And the accusation of paranoia, is that your polite tone overflowing with respect?

By @SnouWmen

It's correct. You are so much paranoid that you create multiple accounts to support your narrative and to give the impression, that there are many of you. It's OK. We recognize you anyhow.

[SnouWmen]

And the way they close threads here with uncomfortable questions means something too! %)

[Abambo]

And the way they close threads here with uncomfortable questions means something too! %)

By @SnouWmen

It's not that your multiple personalities would disagree with you. 

There are effectively people thinking that Adobe is refusing their assets, because they are biased. Adobe stock is a business. The more they sell, the richer they get. They are selling your assets. But the customers only keep buying when they don't need to invest more money into asset research then they need to create their own assets. So your assets need to be clean and usable. If I want to print that on a wall, I don't want an asset wich is full of artefacts that take hell a lot of time to clean out.

[SnouWmen]

As for education.
Let's imagine that you go in for an operation and there is a surgeon with no education!
And he says: "What's the point of education? This is just removing a tumor, pure commerce, a craft! I don't need an education for this, I worked at a meat factory and I know everything!
Would you agree to such an operation? )

[Abambo]

As for education.
Let's imagine that you go in for an operation and there is a surgeon with no education!
And he says: "What's the point of education? This is just removing a tumor, pure commerce, a craft! I don't need an education for this, I worked at a meat factory and I know everything!
Would you agree to such an operation? )

By @SnouWmen

This is nonsense. Pure nonsense. 

But if this would be relevant, Adobe stock could not accept your assets, because you did not prove your educational status. And I would bet, you are not a surgeon. 

[Nancy OShea]

@Abambo 

Stop feeding the troll.

• user-id/34125733
• user-id/34143555
• user-id/21742918

[Abambo]

😉

[SnouWmen]

 Trolling?
Maybe you're all very afraid of being exposed?
Turns out you don't actually know about the quality and reasons for rejecting images!
And you are afraid that others will find out about it too?
Is that why you close topics and ban anyone who starts to realize the truth about you?
But sorry friend, that's not trolling, that's exposing! 

[Abambo]

 Trolling?
Maybe you're all very afraid of being exposed?
Turns out you don't actually know about the quality and reasons for rejecting images!
And you are afraid that others will find out about it too?
Is that why you close topics and ban anyone who starts to realize the truth about you?
But sorry friend, that's not trolling, that's exposing! 

By @SnouWmen

You are trolling and according to the community rules, that is prohibited. 

Just your conspiracy theory that you get an attributed moderator is hillarious and shows that, except for being fed up for not having your assets accepted, you have nothing intelligent to give to this community. Stop jumping into discussions and monopolizing those. If you are unhappy with the way Adobe handles the moderation, you are welcome to leave. 

In the last months, contributors submitted around 100,000,000 assets. If all those assets would be refused for no reason, you would see much more complaints. 

Moderators get training that is specific for stock and very specific for what Adobe expects. For getting this training, you do not need an artistic background. Stock is not judged on artistic value, but on quality needs for customers. 

[SnouWmen]

This is about something else!
You said that moderators here don't need to have an artistic background.
But if we're talking about a doctor, for example? Does a doctor have to have an education?
Or can you go to see a doctor without education? Who will say that it is purely commercial, socks and so on, and he doesn't need education to check you. %)))

[Jill_C]

Adobe Stock is NOT an art gallery, and images are NOT evaluated based on their artistic appeal. They're evaluated based on commercial appeal. Big difference. And don't try to deflect the argument by bringing up doctors. What does that have to do with Adobe Stock. Typical troll behavior...