Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have sent many messages to support about this, but they have done nothing. I do NOT like this degrading label on my own illustrations. I worked hard to learn how to effing draw, and this is an insult.
Since I have gotten no response, I am deleting the images that have gotten this offensive label. I am reuploading the designs.
It's tedious and annoying.
Has anyone else had to deal with this problem?
You need to contact Contributor Support via the “Contact us” link, and you need to wait for an answer from them. There is no other way to revert this. Need help? (Stock Contributor Support). Waiting for this to be fixed is really annoying. However, you should not delete the assets and reupload. That will hurt your portfolio, and you run the risk of running into the same issue again, as Adobe has an artificial intelligence program scanning assets and labelling suspected artificial intelligence as
...Other Contributors have reported that their illustrations have been falsely labeled as Generative AI, and they have managed to get the label changed; however I don't know how long it takes to accomplish that.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I do not understand your problem. Is the illustration designed by you or through generative AI? If the illustration was from you, for instance Photoshop without Firefly, then no label is required.
If it was created with AI, for instance Photoshop with Firefly, then a label is required.
As far as I know, the title nolonger needs the label. You identify it when uploading. Again, this is only required with AI generated images or partialy AI created images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It's mostly older illustrations that I created in CorelDraw. I did not apply the label.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Corel Draw illustrations are most probably vector graphics, and Adobe does not allow generative AI as vector for the moment. I understand that it is annoying, and it most likely hurts your assets, as some people would rather not see AI assets.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think you've missed the critical component here: the author did not use AI in any capacity within their work.
Regardless of if they had a vector or raster output and regardless of any rules for people that ARE using AI, the sole issue faced by the Author seems to be that Adobe decided to erroneously label their art as AI for them even though the label should not have been applied.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think you've missed the critical component here: the author did not use AI in any capacity within their work.
Regardless of if they had a vector or raster output and regardless of any rules for people that ARE using AI, the sole issue faced by the Author seems to be that Adobe decided to erroneously label their art as AI for them even though the label should not have been applied.
By @sixhaunt
No, I didn't miss anything. But let me formulate by this:
If the asset is a vector asset, it can't be generative AI because Adobe does not accept vector assets as generative AI and the user cannot mark assets that are vector as generative AI. So if Adobe marks vector assets as generative AI, they do so by error. If it is generative AI (which it isn't, as they have been created with Corel Draw), the contributor gets suspended.
If they had been photographs or illustrations, there would have been a theoretical chance to submit generative AI and “forgetting” to mark it. So there would have been a theoretical chance that the detection algorithm could have been correct.
Therefore, given the situation, OP can't have submitted generative AI and forgetting to mark it as such. Period.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You need to contact Contributor Support via the “Contact us” link, and you need to wait for an answer from them. There is no other way to revert this. Need help? (Stock Contributor Support). Waiting for this to be fixed is really annoying. However, you should not delete the assets and reupload. That will hurt your portfolio, and you run the risk of running into the same issue again, as Adobe has an artificial intelligence program scanning assets and labelling suspected artificial intelligence as generative, even if they're standard good stuff.
And yes, there are other reports out on this.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Other Contributors have reported that their illustrations have been falsely labeled as Generative AI, and they have managed to get the label changed; however I don't know how long it takes to accomplish that.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It takes probably some time, as we saw that contributor support is rather slow to answer. There is most likely a massively high number of requests to support.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, it happened to me! Some photos i took by myself were refused by Adobe because it said AI was used as well other artists photos, which is not true! How can i warn Adobe about it and ask them to review their evaluation?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You can't. See our responses in your other (duplicate) post.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, it happened to me! Some photos i took by myself were refused by Adobe because it said AI was used as well other artists photos, which is not true! How can i warn Adobe about it and ask them to review their evaluation?
By @giorgiog89706945
This is not the same. OP said that accepted assets get marked as generative AI. Your assets got refused during the submission phase. You are in a different situation. Also, the text that you received is generic, so it exposes some possible reasons for a refusal, but does not say that the refusal is exactly for (all of) those reasons.