Imágenes rechazadas en Adobe

[Recorridos virtuales 360]

Buenos días a todos, me preocupa la cantidad de imágenes que han sido rechazadas por adobe, llevo 84. Empiezo a entender porque son rechazadas y a partir de ahora, procurame esmerarme aun más en la calidad de las mismas, aunque veo algunas de ellas que la verdad una vez comprobadas, no entiendo el rechazo. Tengo varias preguntas:

1º ¿Esas imágenes se puede retocar y volver a subir? ¿Se pueden subir con nombres de fichero distintos?

2º Adobe acepta el formato Webb?

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

If you would attach a 1 or 2 of the refused images we could tell you why they may have been rejected.

Yes, you can retouch and re-edit. There is no need to rename but it is allowed.

What do you mean by Webb format? If you mean WebP, the answer is no. Images should be JPEG or PNG (if they have transparency).

[daniellei4510]

Images can be retouched and uploaded again. However, if the same image is rejected a third time, it would probably be best discontinue attempts to have it accepted. But that's just guesswork on my part. By then, in my opinion, it's time to move on and work to improve other images. File names do not have to be changed. Or they can be. I don't think it really matters one way or the other.

Images should be submitted in .jpg format (or .png format if they have a transparent background). Color space should be sRGB.

If you are having issues with images being rejected, upload the rejected images here and contributors will be more than happy to examine them and provide suggestions for improvement..

[Abambo]

Images can be retouched and uploaded again. However, if the same image is rejected a third time, it would probably be best discontinue attempts to have it accepted. But that's just guesswork on my part. By then, in my opinion, it's time to move on and work to improve other images. 

By daniellei4510

That would be a good strategy. Submitting the same image, unmodified, again and doing that on a systematic basis would be considered as spamming. So do not do that.

Normally I move on after the first refusal on quality issues. For IP reasons, it is sometimes not evident. I once had a red cross, that was far away from the real red cross. I needed to check that out. I also once hat a round iPhone button, where I needed some iterations, to get that out of the way. Logos, however, are obvious.

[daniellei4510]

Yeah, I normally don't bother fixing Quality Issues unless it's something so obvious that I could slap myself for overlooking it. Or for submitting it in the first place. (What was I thinking?) I have had one asset rejected for Technical Issues, which is much more specific compared to Quality Issues that it was easy to pinpoint the problem, fix it, and re-submit. Quality Issues is too vague a concept to obsess over and it's best to move on in most cases.

[Jill_C]

Yes, it is acceptable to re-edit and re-submit rejected images, though I wouldn't do it more than once, or you could be accused of spamming the database. 

[Abambo]

Adobe does not (yet) accept the WebP format.

[Recorridos virtuales 360]

Gracias a todos por la pronta respuesta. Creo que estoy empezando a cogerle el "tranquillo" a esto.

[Abambo]

You're welcome.