Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Sabrina3424354231n54m , the technical issues in your photos are easier to see when viewing at 100% magnification.
In #1, the highlights are overexposed (especially noticeable in the clouds that have no details), there are artifacts and halos in your image and the focus isn't sharp.
In #2 there are the same issues and the artifacts are very noticeable by the chimneys of the buildings.
In #3, again the same issues with soft focus, artifacts and overblown highlights. You might also
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Sabrina3424354231n54m , the technical issues in your photos are easier to see when viewing at 100% magnification.
In #1, the highlights are overexposed (especially noticeable in the clouds that have no details), there are artifacts and halos in your image and the focus isn't sharp.
In #2 there are the same issues and the artifacts are very noticeable by the chimneys of the buildings.
In #3, again the same issues with soft focus, artifacts and overblown highlights. You might also have an Intellectual Property violation with the College name on the building. It would probably be best to clone the name out.
Your F stop looks to have been quite open in all of the images you showed. For landscape photography in particular, closing the aperature (a higher F stop number) will give you a better focus throughout the image and would prevent some of the overexposure in these photos taken on bright sunny days.
If you are new to stock photography, here are some resources that you might find helpful.
Best of luck in your future submissions.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The main issues in the first photo are overexposed highlights in the clouds and noise in the sky.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Bonjour Sabrina,
Les problèmes techniques n'ont rien à voir avec la résolution des images, celle-ci est déjà interceptée lors du téléchargement.
@reedesign1912 t'a expliqué en détail les problèmes techniques, je ne vais pas répéter ici ce que Rob a dit.
Juste un mot sur Gênes2.JPG : cette photo a été prise avec ISO160. L'appareil photo a de toute façon un capteur un peu plus petit, donc l'ISO devrait toujours rester minimale. De plus, le flash de l'appareil photo a été activé, mais cela n'a aucun effet sur une telle image.
Il y a cependant, outre la réalisation technique, d'autres choses à considérer. Le modérateur signale uniquement la première erreur qu'il voit. Nous essayons toujours de donner le plus d'informations possible :
Propriété Intellectuelle :
Model Release (Autorisation de droit à l’image (personne physique)):