• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

It seems that Adobe doesn't accept AI generated images anymore though it still allow to submit.

Community Beginner ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Recently, I submityed a few AI generated images (including images generated by using Adobe AI as well) which have the same quality of images I submitted and accepted before. All of them are rejected by the quality issues. Don't know why? Adobe never gave detailed explanation. It seems that even Adobe itself doesn't support its own AI generated images. very frustrated!!! In addition, it doesn't provide any ways to communicate with its reviewers to learn what Adobe really looks for about AI genearted image. Should I submit them under illustration instead of Photo to make difference?

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors , Fotolia , Troubleshooting

Views

552

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Some basic editing could help with the baby panda. The eyes could be improved. At the bottom, there appears to be some "cotton candy like" fluff that could be removed. And that white dot on its nose. Simple enough to remove.

Savannah Sunset. Some dust-spotting would help. Also, the baby looks like it's grown out of its mother's face, rather than be separate.

 

Lion King. The lion's teeth should be white. More dust-spotting needed.

 

Golden Embrace is the best of the four, but a couple of things could be improved upon.

 

Golden Embrace Motherhood in the Wild copy adobe stock.jpg

 

All that said, it is not the job of the moderator's or Adobe to give you detailed critiques as to why images get rejected. That is what this forum is for. And Firefly was not created specifically for people to create perfect AI images suitable for stock. Editing will always be required.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you very much for your advice. Normally, I spent a couple of hours to process an AI generated image. The raw images generated by AI have some issues. Though moderator's job isn't give contributors details. But some kind of explanation is very helpufl to the contributors to improve in the future. Just like a student who hands in the exam,  would like to know where he or she made mistakes if he or she didn't pass. Anyway, just my two cents. I believe that moderators get paid to do this job instead of volunteering.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Moderators are moderating for the customers, to protect them from bad assets. They need to move fast to moderate all those files that get submitted. The refusal reason given by the moderator is basic, but still it's important. But there is no precise assessment, also because they refuse on the first error they see. 

 

As a contributor you are supposed to submit perfect assets… Firefly generated assets are not perfect, as aren't all other generative AI assets. 

 

Panda: look at the paws. The 5 finger rule also applies to pandas. The area around the eyes should be black fur. In your picture it's a black patch. 

 

Savana sunset: 

Abambo_2-1720414480961.png

The ear is weird, the shadow on the mother from the cub is from a bad cutout. You have aliasing on the fur and the whiskers are not looking correct.

 

The lion king picture has a black line, in addition to many artefacts. 

 

The golden embrace: You have a noise pattern on the image, looks a bit like halftone from a scan. The fur looks weird. You have aliasing.

Abambo_1-1720414264469.png

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you very much for feedback

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You're welcome.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 09, 2024 Jul 09, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

.... But some kind of explanation is very helpufl to the contributors to improve in the future. Just like a student who hands in the exam,  would like to know where he or she made mistakes if he or she didn't pass. 


By @ShawnW98560

 

When I sat an exam, the wrong answer was just marked wrong - no explanation of why it was wrong. 

It's the student's job to find out why! 

With Adobe Stock it is accepted or not - with some template reason. The 'why' is where you can come here to find out why. The answers/opinions at times can be varied though.

As mentioned many times before - Adobe Stock is not a learning platform - but to sell high-quality images (one hopes they are high-quality!)

My opinion on the Golden embrace - to add as it is a photo-realistic image - would be to tone down the yellow a bit. It's just a bit too yellow and there are signs of noise in the background!

 

ricky336_0-1720511677902.png

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 11, 2024 Jul 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks for your feedback!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It is not the job of the Moderators to instruct you in what constitutes a quality image. Imagine what would happen if every contributor contacted moderators to get a detailed explanation for every reject! Reviews of new submissions would grind to a halt. Adobe has made no assertion that images from Firefly are stock-worthy. I wouldn't consider any of these to be photo-realistic, so all should have been submitted as AI generated illustrations rather than under the Photos  file type.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

thanks for you response.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have AI images accepted every day of the week, including weekends. I have a 97% acceptance rate. They are more than open to accepting AI generated images.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Good for you. What's the link of your Adobe site? thanks

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 07, 2024 Jul 07, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I won't do that, because I don't feel this is the place to promote my profile page for a variety of reasons. But here is an example of how I edit when AI gives me garbage results. You can never edit enough. You just need to know when it's time to stop and submit the asset before you drive yourself nuts. And yes, the edited image was accepted.

441931950_10160196924291848_4274941670746681450_n.jpg

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you very much for sharing! I noticed that AI normally doesn't generate very high quality of images for wild animals in nature compared with pets. Maybe because of training images.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

Thank you very much for sharing! I noticed that AI normally doesn't generate very high quality of images for wild animals in nature compared with pets. Maybe because of training images.


By @ShawnW98560


Whatever AI normally does not generate correctly needs to be corrected. Even if a bad asset slips through, it will hound you someday. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 11, 2024 Jul 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you very much for your feedback!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Not true that they not accepting anymore AI

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 11, 2024 Jul 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's a good news.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Adobe Stock accepts high quality assets that are commercial-ready for use.  If you're not meeting Stock's high standards bar, examine your work more closely at 100-300% magnification and make necessary corrections. If you can't fix it, scrap it and start over. 

 

We've seen more than our share of 3 legged models and 5 legged horses here. It's a wonder that contributors don't notice such blatant mistakes but they do.  AI is ignorant about anatomy and facial details like hair, eyes, ears, nose, mouth, fingers, toes, clothing, etc...  And the more complex your image is, the greater potential for AI drawing errors. Keep it simple. 

 

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

"We've seen more than our share of 3 legged models and 5 legged horses here. It's a wonder that contributors don't notice such blatant mistakes but they do.  AI is ignorant about anatomy and facial details like hair, eyes, ears, nose, mouth, fingers, toes, clothing, etc...  And the more complex your image is, the greater potential for AI drawing errors. Keep it simple. "

Nancy O'Shea

Actually, I'm not surprised. I like to do my preliminary editing on my laptop at my local bar. It's not a pro machine, so I mostly just prep my assets and do the real work on my desktop at home. The regulars are well aware of what I'm doing, so they pretty much leave me to myself while they discuss baseball, golf, politics and what have you.

But a couple of days ago, one of the regulars had no other place to sit down except next to me while I was working. He started asking about AI and wanted to know what all this "editing" entails. I was working on a photorealistic portrait and I pointed out to him that one of the subject's eyes was shaped like an over rather than round, that an ear was misshapen, and that her teeth were crooked. His response? "Oh, I never would have noticed that. I don't even see what's wrong now that you pointed stuff out!"

 

So it's not just contributors who don't notice the obvious details. It's the buyers as well, which is even more unfortunate. I don't know what could be at play here other than some sort of blindness, much like a bad singer who can't be convinced that they sing off-key. On the bright side, I do believe that AI contributors CAN be trained to start recognizing the issues. The buyers, not so much, which would certainly explain why bad assets still manage to be sold without any follow-up complaints.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 08, 2024 Jul 08, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

One person's trash is another person's treasure.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 11, 2024 Jul 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

To be honest, sometimes, imprefectionism is kind of beauty of art. There are many good examples I believe we all see them somewhere. When I saw an imperfect thing in an AI image, I asked myself "should I make it prefect symmetry or shape as it supposes to be in real life? What if it just grows like this in the real world? What if this is a real photo, should I correct it?" Anyway, I think there isn't right or wrong answer for it.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 13, 2024 Jul 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

To be honest, sometimes, imperfection is kind of beauty of art.

By @ShawnW98560

===========

Stock is not an art gallery.  Stock is a global assets business that connects worthy Contributors with millions of potential customers.  Stock's customers expect highest visual & technical quality for use in commercial projects. In this context, imperfections are not desirable. They will warrant rejection by Reviewers and customers alike.  Contributors who receive too many complaints/refund requests are at risk of being blocked or having their account permanently terminated.  😝

 

There are other microstock services to which you can contribute.  However most other services do not accept Generative AI artwork. 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 14, 2024 Jul 14, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

...imprefectionism is kind of beauty of art.


By @ShawnW98560

 

I don't actually believe that to be true. People are striving for perfection - just look at Instagram and the use of filters. Portraits - cloning out spots and imperfections on the face and body, using filters to get the 'perfect' look; the profile photo has to be 'perfect', people don't want imperfection, even in art!  (Unless it might be a specific display at an art gallery focusing on imperfection, which then requires specific marketing.)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jul 11, 2024 Jul 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. This is why I'll be very happy if a moderator can give a little more info about unaccept images to help me see what I maynot be able to see. Maybe I ask too much.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines