It seems that Adobe doesn't accept AI generated images anymore though it still allow to submit.

[WP98560]

Recently, I submityed a few AI generated images (including images generated by using Adobe AI as well) which have the same quality of images I submitted and accepted before. All of them are rejected by the quality issues. Don't know why? Adobe never gave detailed explanation. It seems that even Adobe itself doesn't support its own AI generated images. very frustrated!!! In addition, it doesn't provide any ways to communicate with its reviewers to learn what Adobe really looks for about AI genearted image. Should I submit them under illustration instead of Photo to make difference?

[daniellei4510]

That won't happen. 🙂 It is not the moderators' job to do so. That's what this forum is here for. 

[Nancy OShea]

I'll be very happy if a moderator can give more info about unaccept images...

By @WP98560

==========

Everything you need to know is contained in your Stock Contributor User Guide.  Read it carefully.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/submission-guidelines.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/vector-requirements.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html 
• Model/Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

Good luck.

[Abambo]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. This is why I'll be very happy if a moderator can give a little more info about unaccept images to help me see what I maynot be able to see. Maybe I ask too much.

By @WP98560

That would slow down the moderation process even further. Your assets would be moderated somewhere in 10 years. Contributors are supposed to submit correct assets only. They are expected to read the manual and are considered to master the art of submitting.

[Abambo]

We've seen more than our share of 3 legged models and 5 legged horses here. It's a wonder that contributors don't notice such blatant mistakes but they do.  AI is ignorant about anatomy and facial details like hair, eyes, ears, nose, mouth, fingers, toes, clothing, etc...  And the more complex your image is, the greater potential for AI drawing errors. Keep it simple. 

By @Nancy OShea

They don't check for 6-finger-hands, and they don't see the weird geometry, not to mention the artefacts, They think that as it has been generated by something called intelligent, that it is perfect. They don't connect the dots. 😉

Some even pretend that those are unavoidable errors and Adobe needs to accept them and the buyer can decide, if they want the asset, even if it is crooked.

[WP98560]

Thank you very much for your feedback! I am trying my best to upload commercial-ready images. As you said, the more complex the image is, the more errors AI produces. I have created over 15K AI images in total. There were less than 3% of images which were ok, but still need me to make many corrections.

[William Champlin]

From Adobe Contributor Requirement help page:

• Submit your generative AI image as asset type: Photos, if it looks like it was captured with a camera and features photo-realistic subjects that exist in real life and respect human and animal anatomy.
• Submit your generative AI image as asset type: Illustrations, if it features artistic illustrations or fantasy concepts such as imaginative depictions of people, food, animals, environments that one would not necessarily see in real life.

[WP98560]

Thanks for youre response!