3 Correct answers
stock_cloto_palma-001.jpg - chromatic aberration and a strong vignette. Adobe Stock guidelines soecufucally say to avoid vignettes.
stock_cloto_palma-009.jpg - seems to be underexposed
stock_cloto_palma-004.jpg - focus is soft and there's a spot in the sky that should have been removed
stock_cloto_palma-007.jpg - there's a lens spot or sensor spot in the left edge
Hi @CLOTO ,
When taking photos for stock, try to remove the objects in the forefront of your subject. If you cannot remove them, adjust your f-stop to get depth and include them in your focus. Setting that aside, the cat in the first picture is not in sharp focus.
The second photo is underexposed.
The third picture is also underexposed and need more depth.
The fourth picture is also underexposed.
I will stop here. I suggest you zoom in on your files to between 100 and 200% and inspect them for
...
Yo creo que el problema, a parte de los defectos técnicos que ya te han comentado, reside en el tipo de fotografias que ofreces. No es que sean mejores o peores, si no que, a mi modesto entender, no responden a lo que se suele pedir en las plataformas de stock. No son "comerciales", al menos la mayoría de ellas. Discrepo con quienes dicen que la foto del gato debería ser editada para eliminar los cables que "ensucian" la imagen, ya que está claro que los has incluido con toda la intención. Estoy
...
23
Replies
Look at your first photo. The wires cross through your photo and subject and dsirupt everything.
The pipe on the right side is just a huge blur in your photo.
You need to learn to compose in camera and and then correct in post production. Yes, you need post production. Products similar to Lightroom and Photoshop. Here is a quick example of what I mean:
This editing corrects your photo and increases the chances that your photo will get accepted into the database and that it will find potential buyers.
stock_cloto_palma-001.jpg - chromatic aberration and a strong vignette. Adobe Stock guidelines soecufucally say to avoid vignettes.
stock_cloto_palma-009.jpg - seems to be underexposed
stock_cloto_palma-004.jpg - focus is soft and there's a spot in the sky that should have been removed
stock_cloto_palma-007.jpg - there's a lens spot or sensor spot in the left edge
Hi @CLOTO ,
When taking photos for stock, try to remove the objects in the forefront of your subject. If you cannot remove them, adjust your f-stop to get depth and include them in your focus. Setting that aside, the cat in the first picture is not in sharp focus.
The second photo is underexposed.
The third picture is also underexposed and need more depth.
The fourth picture is also underexposed.
I will stop here. I suggest you zoom in on your files to between 100 and 200% and inspect them for issues.
This is a list of what your need to look for and correct before you submit.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
It's really strange that you think there are no clear criteria for refusing your pictures.
The first is badly compose, the third too. I did not check sharpness or exposition, but I guess that I will find errors with that too.
I suppose that all your pictures involving sky and clouds expose some sensor dust:
I did not check the other pictures, but your camera needs some serious sensor cleaning.
Conclusion: there are alsways obvious and real reasons to refuse a picture. The personal taste of the moderator is not a refusal reason. The moderator would never refuse your first because they hate cats. If technically OK, it would pass.
As a tipp: when you get refusals, do not post many pictures here. We are volunteers, checking your pictures costs time. When you post many pictures, you will not get a complete analysis of any of them, and many won't even be looked at. So if you are clever, you chose max 3 of your assets, where you can't explain the refusal. Then you apply the same checks to all of your refused assets, and if then, you still have a question on a different picture, you can always come back to the thread or even open a new one.
AdChoices
