Motivos de rechazo tecnico

[cavigu]

Quisiera conocer los motivos de rechazo de estas imagines, para aprender

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Image 1:  Under exposed.  Not enough light.

Image 2:  Uneven lighting. Not enough focus. 

Stock has over 23 million images of flowers.  It's unlikely anyone will see your flowers, much less buy them. 😞

For future reference, read your Stock Contributor User Guide.  There is good information there to help you.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

[cavigu]

Gracias por su respuesta, como mencione es para ir aprendiento y mi motivacion no es vender en este momento; pero siempre la es importante el impulso extra entre esos 23 MM de imagenes

[Abambo]

Adobe stock is not a good place to learn photography. You really need to take a course and/or join a local photo club for that. And then you need to learn that stock requirements are very specific. They need a clean, but unspectecular processing.

[Jill_C]

I think you've misunderstood the business model and purpose of Adobe stock. This is not a place to improve your photography and editing skills and get your images viewed by others. You will receive very little feedback from Adobe stock that will help you to improve. There are platforms to do that - Flickr, instagram, Smugzmug and others. This is a place for comepetent, skilled photographers and illustrators to upload images of quality and earn a bit of passive income. For many of us who already have archives full of high quality images, it's a way to monetize those. If you're hoping to learn more about photography and editing, there are many other online sources of info.

[cavigu]

Disculpe Jill no he entendido  mal el modelo  de Adobe, sino que no entiendo si pregunto las razones de rechazo TECNICAS, sale con una estadistica de 25 MM que nunca van a ver las mias y menos venderlas? Ya ando mejorando preguntando, estudiando, recibiendo cursos y donde menos necesito son los sarcamos para aprender. Sus observaciones TECNICAS (que era lo que pregunte) fueron muy livianas pero bien recibidas (al buen entendedor, pocas palabras; dice el dicho) pero de ahi en adelante pobre aporte le esta dando a Adobe, deberia de coger un curso de empatia y cordialidad; no tuve la dicha de nacer aprendido como su persona se define.

Por otro lado, he recibido de otros expertos colaboradores retroalimentaciones valiosas, ilustradas y con consejos practicos para mejorar, no comentarios negativos y poco humildes sin ningun sustento para mejorar; deberia acercarse a estos EXPERTOS que supongo empezaron de poco. Dichosos los iluminados