Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you include Property Releases for both of these images when you submitted them?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Quality issues aside, those are name brands. Off limits for commercial use.
Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @juan_jose_7431 ,
I am assuming both files are for Editorial propose. The first file appears to be excessively compressed. The edge is not completely sharp and there is a halo that's visible along the left edge of the can and hand.
The second image also appears to be excessively compressed and not sharp. There is a halo to the right of the second image.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As mentioned already, this is an IP violation. Do you want unauthorized persons making money off of your photos? Well that is what you are doing with these properties.
There are also quality problems. Some of which have been pointed out.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
I would also make a small suggestion that the white balance is slightly off; it is just a wee bit too yellow.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The size of a picture in pixels is not a sign of quality! If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
BTW: if it wouldn't be "quality issues", it would be "IP violations", as you cannot show logos of products, except with illustrative editorial, which is a very narrow field of application.