potential high sales, rejected, photo

[anjarg60085798]

my item got rejected can you guys help me? any input to fix this?

this one rejection pretty much screwed my income for january and february and so on....

i have uploaded these types of item like 5 times without issue, they getting 300-500+ download in like 6months, most buyer usually bought more than one, so safe to say they like them or they are good..

i manually edited to a pixel level fiber, hair etc..

i live in asia unique price tag/label are hard to find, theyre mostly plain white. so effort is high on this....

yes, theyre old, gross sticker. i choose that on purpose.

its a more than a month to review so 10 more rejection its pretty much a year to get this uploaded... its really discouraging, but the sales is too good to give up

[anjarg60085798]

btw the first preview is 1500x pixel (afraid someone stole the image lol). the original file is 14000+ pixel.

[Abambo]

What camera takes pictures of 14000 pixels?

[anjarg60085798]

each sticker is around 2500x2500 pixel, took it with macro lens

[Jill_C]

You did not indicate the rejection reason. There is no avenue for you to dispute the findings of the Adobe Stock Moderators. 

[anjarg60085798]

well its "quality issue".

honestly after AI all rejection are just "quality issue".  is the reasoning even valid nowadays? i feel the reviewer are overwhelmed with AI they just put quality issue on everything. this is very clear when i upload vector the rejection aren't make sense. before AI i got various different rejection.

• Your vector file contains a raster/bitmap image, and vector files must not contain raster elements.
• Your JPEG preview file has been compressed too much, so textural problems have occurred in the file.
• Your JPEG preview resolution must not be less than 5,000 X 3,000 (15 million pixels)
• You didn't use anti-aliasing when exporting your vector file to JPEG, so there are problems with lines on the JPEG file.

no raster, no textural issue, it more than 15mil pixel etc, etc.. the fix was literally nothing to do with those list

[daniellei4510]

Sorry, but kind of tired of everybody blaming Ai for their rejections. This is just sour grapes. Yes, there was a LOT of AI crap submitted in the early stages, but this is not the case anymore. People blaming AI for a slow down in moderation was one thing, but blaming it for rejections? That's a bit much. 

[anjarg60085798]

wait, what?? i didnt blame the rejection on ai, i blame the reasoning behind the rejection... it used to be clearer you know what to fix... now literally everything is quality issue. you simply just scroll this forum all are quality issue... 

[anjarg60085798]

sorry for bringing AI, this isnt going nowhere i feel like..

guys let say that image is yours... how can you fix to get it approved?

[vicentegarridoj · Accepted solution]

perhaps, replace the labels with new ones so they don't have the grainy/noise effect.

[George_F]

The rejection reason points towards you submitting this as a vector?  If so, that would be grounds for a valid rejection.  Adding pixel images to vectors is against the guidelines for submission.

[Abambo]

This is a vector file?

[Abambo]

Your 100% shows colour grain. For the rest, I'm astonished that this should get 500 sales in 6 months. I'm doing something wrong.