Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Person on the left - ring, earring and eyelashes and not well drawn. Blownout hotspot on her cheek.
person on the right has an odd highlight / shadow on her cheek.
Looking at your picture at 100%: quality issues, as you have a lot of artefacts around the face(s) and propably all over the picture.
The fly-away hairs need cleaning up. And I know from experience that hair with areas that look like the start of a bird's nest will get an image rejected. Generative fill can usually clean things up with more realistic hair. In any case, I'm not sure if this image is salvagable. Even facial restoration software would not help the woman on the right, as it doesn't know what to do with three-quarter profiles.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What was the rejection reason? Give us only the header, please.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Quality issue (ПИТАННЯ ЯКОСТІ in my language)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Sorry, you mentioned it in the subject. Is it generative AI?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Person on the left - ring, earring and eyelashes and not well drawn. Blownout hotspot on her cheek.
person on the right has an odd highlight / shadow on her cheek.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Looking at your picture at 100%: quality issues, as you have a lot of artefacts around the face(s) and propably all over the picture.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The fly-away hairs need cleaning up. And I know from experience that hair with areas that look like the start of a bird's nest will get an image rejected. Generative fill can usually clean things up with more realistic hair. In any case, I'm not sure if this image is salvagable. Even facial restoration software would not help the woman on the right, as it doesn't know what to do with three-quarter profiles.