Quality issues

[Александр21775853b34m]

Quality issues. Thank you

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Александр21775853b34m ,

This looks like a poorly cropped png file. The edges do not appear to be smooth.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Александр21775853b34m]

This is a burnt-out LED light bulb with a plastic bulb crookedly cut with a knife, placed on its base on a white sheet of paper and photographed from above.

[Александр21775853b34m]

Should I have cut it straight with a steel knife?

[oleschwander]

But the paper is not white.

[Александр21775853b34m]

Thanks for your opinion. It's quite possible. But when I sent the photo, its title was: "An open LED bulb without a cover with a burned out LED." The word "white" was only in the keywords - in the second ten.

[Александр21775853b34m]

And the word "paper" was completely absent from both the title and the keywords.

[Nancy OShea]

What is it? And what commercial value does this have for Stock customers?

[Александр21775853b34m]

This is an LED bulb with a burned out LED.

[Александр21775853b34m]

This is the main reason why LED bulbs stop working.

[Nancy OShea]

I see. Your photo lacks context. 

This is your competition in Stock:

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=burned+out+light+bulb

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=burned+out+LED+light

I hope that helps. 

[Александр21775853b34m]

  Thank you, Nancy OShea, for your willingness to help. I understand what you mean. You think there is a composition problem here, which is also a quality issues. It seems that this is the case, you are right. But unfortunately, I'm more interested in things that aren't quite clear when you look at them. When someone asks, "What is this?" like you. But that's my problem. Thanks again, and best regards, Alex.

[Ricky336]

Hello,

Try to give context to your subject. I also wondered what you were trying to show. Now I know.

Give your subject some reference. This is also where composition comes in!

[Александр21775853b34m]

Привет, Ricky336! Ежедневно в Adobe Stock загружаются несколько миллионов файлов. У кого есть время просматривать их все и когда? Мои фотографии всегда отклоняются на второй день — как будто этим занимается компьютерная программа (ИИ).
Эти фотографии были приняты. У них такое же полное отсутствие контекста и та же композиция, что и у отклоненной фотографии. На них просто изображен конкретный объект.
Единственное отличие между отклоненной фотографией и принятой — это ключевые слова.
Когда я загружал отклоненную фотографию, автоматически предлагались ключевые слова (те, которые ИИ считал релевантными). И впервые я увидел, что ни одно из них не соответствовало фотографии. ИИ предлагал такие слова, как: циферблат, часы, спидометр и так далее. Единственное слово, которое я использовал из предложенных ИИ, было «белый».
При отправке принятых фотографий я всегда использовал гораздо больше ключевых слов, предложенных ИИ.
И, похоже, ИИ «обиделся».

[Александр21775853b34m]

Hey Ricky336! Several million files are uploaded to Adobe Stock every day. Who has time to look through them all and when? My photos are always rejected on the second day - as if a computer program (AI) were doing it.
These photos were accepted. They have the same complete lack of context and the same composition as the rejected photograph. They simply show a specific subject.
The only difference between a rejected photo and accepted photos is the keywords.
When I uploaded a rejected photo, keywords were automatically suggested (keywords the AI ​​considered relevant). And for the first time, I saw that none of them matched the photo. The AI ​​suggested words like: dial, clock, speedometer, and so on. The only word I used from the AI ​​suggestions was "white."
When submitting accepted photos, I always used many more of the AI-suggested keywords.
And it looks like the AI ​​was "offended".

[Jill_C]

You said "Who has time to look through them all and when?" Adobe employs perhaps several hundred human moderators who are tasked with reviewing all of our images. That's why the time to review can be so variable. However, there is a widespread belief, not confirmed by Adobe, that they are using AI tools for at least part of the process.

[daniellei4510]

If a photo was rejected for quality issues, or if it was accepted, it was reviewed by a moderator. When rejected for "similar content," we suspect a bot is at play. With a few exceptions, I always put Adobe's suggested keywords at the bottom of the list in hopes of avoiding the latter issue, since logic suggests Adobe's suggested keywords may be based on "similar content" refusals.