Quality Issues

[Mathias34430720u8h6]

Hello, I create content with spatial design and architecture content using AI. It is absolutely incomprehensible to me when my pictures are rejected. These kinds of arbitrary rejections cost me and Adobe pointless time. The rejection reason “quality problems” is used excessively and is not helpful to me. Does anyone happen to know how to avoid such rejections?

[moderator detached from unrelated thread]

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

We'd need a higher resolution image to really get into the details, but there are a number of poorly formed objects that will result in a refusal. I've circled just a few.

[Mathias34430720u8h6]

Thank you for your honest review!
Greetings

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Hello, I create content with spatial design and architecture content using AI. It is absolutely incomprehensible to me when my pictures are rejected. These kinds of arbitrary rejections cost me and Adobe pointless time. The rejection reason “quality problems” is used excessively and is not helpful to me. Does anyone happen to know how to avoid such rejections?

By @Mathias34430720u8h6

You have quality issues in your asset. Check for artefacts and odd geometry at 100%. Generative AI is espacially bad with symetric design and beautifiers, parallel lines etc. Look at your ceiling. Then, you should not have artefacts, like odd colour changes or compression artefact in your image.  

If you want to avoid refusals, you need really to identify and correct these errors. Customers expect assets they can use right out of the box, without the need for first correcting the images. 

Btw: Please do not hijack other discussions. Create your thread, so that the answers can concentrate on your problems. 

[Mathias34430720u8h6]

Sorry for hijack the discussion, but i was unable to find some way to start a own thread.

The structure of this forum is very confusing.

Greenings

[Abambo]

You can create your own thread with "Post to the community". Forum moderators are sometimes snarky. That's not an issue, most of the times. 😉

[George_F]

When I zoom in on the details of this image, there were errors that I thought were easy to spot.  Plants missing from vases, bottles on the shelf blended together, the details of the couches looked off in places, and the legs of the chairs at the bar are missing or incomplete in places.  I think the rejection is justified in this case.

[RALPH_L]

I agree with the others, there are a lot of rendering errors in this image. Also, the focus is too soft.

You ask how to avoid these errors. That is simple. Read the post here in this foorum. We constantly point out renering errors and always advice contributors to view their images at 100-300% and correct the renering errors. You must pay attention to the details. 

Also, the image should be jpg and not png.

[Mathias34430720u8h6]

Thank you for your honest review!
Greetings