Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello, a question of curiosity, I uploaded the attached image, it is generated in artificial intelligence, I created a "fantasy" atmosphere uploaded as AI content, graphic resources category, but I am told that it has quality problems and that too strong filters have been used, how do you behave when you upload images with this mood that can be misunderstood?
Thanks
[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]
The balls on the tree are not perfectly round, the ribbons aren't exactly perfect, and, to the best of my knowledge, snow balls do not fall from the sky. 🙂 The mood of the asset did not factor in as to the refusal of this images.
How do you know it is due to filters being too strong? Rejections reasons are never than specific. I think the reason for rejection for the first images was due to artifacts within the text. But I'm not a moderator, so I can't be sure of that. As for the "snowballs" being bokeh...first, they don't strike me as bokeh; secondly, it's one example of what MIGHT have been the cause for rejection, when in fact the malformed bulbs on the tree were probably the first and foremost reason. It only takes o
...Oh...and maybe the reason the first one was rejected was because you or the AI spelled "happy" wrong. 🙂
The refusal reasons given are simply generic text. They just try to enumerate the most common reasons for that refusal type. Moderators do not give out specific refusal reasons. That would take them too much time. So, filters may or may not be the refusal reason, as could be exposure, focus, composition, white balance, artifacts or any other reason.
In the case above it surely is the orthography.
Your picture is not the original as uploaded to stock, so it is quite impossible to check for a bunch of possible errors. But even so, I think that there are more than one error in this asset:
Generative AI is not perfect, and sometimes Adobe does a good job at checking those assets.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The balls on the tree are not perfectly round, the ribbons aren't exactly perfect, and, to the best of my knowledge, snow balls do not fall from the sky. 🙂 The mood of the asset did not factor in as to the refusal of this images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I understand perfectly, and seeing other posts I see that this requested perfection is a common thing, I am "new" to selling images made with artificial intelligence I have only published photographs, but the thing that leaves me surprised is that they talk to me about photographic filters that are too strong, not so much about the appearance of the objects or coherence, even in the sky they are not snowballs but bokeh, but this is another thing.
For example, two other very similar images, one accepted and one rejected always for filters that are too strong, not even for similar photos..
I don't understand this, I'm studying a lot to understand all the rules and mechanisms to be able to publish AI material but I see that it is not easy.
rejected
accepted
  
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
How do you know it is due to filters being too strong? Rejections reasons are never than specific. I think the reason for rejection for the first images was due to artifacts within the text. But I'm not a moderator, so I can't be sure of that. As for the "snowballs" being bokeh...first, they don't strike me as bokeh; secondly, it's one example of what MIGHT have been the cause for rejection, when in fact the malformed bulbs on the tree were probably the first and foremost reason. It only takes one issue...just one...to result in a refusal.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Oh...and maybe the reason the first one was rejected was because you or the AI spelled "happy" wrong. 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The refusal reasons given are simply generic text. They just try to enumerate the most common reasons for that refusal type. Moderators do not give out specific refusal reasons. That would take them too much time. So, filters may or may not be the refusal reason, as could be exposure, focus, composition, white balance, artifacts or any other reason.
In the case above it surely is the orthography.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your picture is not the original as uploaded to stock, so it is quite impossible to check for a bunch of possible errors. But even so, I think that there are more than one error in this asset:
Generative AI is not perfect, and sometimes Adobe does a good job at checking those assets.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
yes, true, I still reloaded the image by inserting fantasy image in the description and it was accepted and also already sold.
So many times you make assumptions that are worth the time you find.
Thanks a lot anyway for the very useful and constructive opinions, when I generate other images in the future I will pay attention to these details.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If this image has been accepted as this, then the moderator did a poor job. If the buyers do not complain, then they do not need a quality image. For some uses, it may be good enough...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
yes it has been accepted and already sold, maybe for web use or low quality it's fine