Question about quality

[Andrew28402168wx0r]

I am not entierly sure what do they mean by quality. Are they against surrealistic transformation of the doctor, or disliking the chaotic visual style of the villain?

[Henrik Heigl]

Hi,

is this AI Art and is it all the Release Forms handeled? I assume that it is because of the very blurry Images, the right ear is cut off, dark Bottom half, etc. Hope that helps.

[Fabiobtex · Accepted solution]

Art is hard to judge, the deformed hands could be explained by the transformation but not the glasses, not the badge and that kind of blots:

The second one has color problem probably caused by upscaling:

[Andrew28402168wx0r]

What is the color problem, exactly? Your screenshot is just black page.

[Fabiobtex]

If you can't see it even when you maximize it, it could be your monitor configuration, try some brightness/contrast adjusts.

All these red spots where it should be uniform are caused by some transformation, probably upscaling, they are discreet but visible.

[Andrew28402168wx0r]

But why do they matter if they are barely visible?

[Fabiobtex]

They ARE visible and probably Adobe workers use professional color fidelity screens where those purple/blue pixels screams among the black ones. Customers, most of whom are also professionals, want quality for what they're paying.
That's a problem that can be corrected by repaiting your backgound but I'm not saying that is your only problem or that was the reason for rejecting your image.

[Abambo]

They matter because they matter, and it is a defect that will show up in print!

[Abambo]

You are clipping your blacks.

(blue)

You have artefacts that are typical for generative AI:

(kind of mosaic)

(blurry where around it stays sharp)

One of those errors will be enough to earn your refusal, and moderators refuse on the first error they see.

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

The problem is that the overall quality begins to fall when it is examined more closely:

Just a few things that look odd, even though it is an AI illustration.

You should look at these links about AI:

https://www.behance.net/videos/d5886b09-7fa7-4c0e-8a27-0d4b9451884a/Submitting-and-selling-generativ...
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-faq.html
https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-g...
https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td...

There are enough potential problems in quality for it to be rejected I think.

[Andrew28402168wx0r]

What exactly is wrong with deformed body parts of a mutated person? It's by design, not an error.

[George_F · Accepted solution]

Anatomy is specifically mentioned in the Generative AI submission guidelines.  The fingers aren't the only thing that's off, the stethoscope doesn't have any earpieces and tubes that lead to no where.

It's important to realize we don't know the exact reasons and can only speculate, but there is enough here along with the combination of the noise and artefacts in shadow areas that the rejection seems justified to me.

[George_F]

There also appears to be a Christmas ornament in the healthcare worker photo.

[Abambo]

There also appears to be a Christmas ornament in the healthcare worker photo.

By @George_F

It's a horror picture. 😄

I saw that, but it'the least problem…

[Abambo]

It's an error:

If it's by design, the perspective needs to be correct!

Even for horror pictures, you need to respect some current quality requirements:

You clearly see here conceptual errors, errors in instrumental designs, optical errors all on a small space of your picture.

These hard edges break the blurred edges here around:

(or vice versa)

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Nothing wrong with deformed body parts. Comic strip artists do a better job though of a mutated person than AI. (At the moment.)

[Jill_C]

Count the fingers.... I'm sure it's something the Moderators have been trained to do...

[Andrew28402168wx0r]

If they do that for surrealistic art depicting clearly mutating person, then they are just being ridiculous.

[Jill_C]

Or maybe that's not the kind of "art" that they consider saleable on their platform?

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

If they do that for surrealistic art depicting clearly mutating person, then they are just being ridiculous.

By @Andrew28402168wx0r

You have enough problems with that picture. One of those is enough to earn you a refusal for quality issues.

You really need to understand, that even for the most outlandish claims, you need to keep it logical. Even if you argue that you have a transformation of the person, and that therefore that person can be deformed at will (a claim that I would contest strongly), simple accessories still have to be well-designed.

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

OK.  First image.  How many fingers and thumbs do human's have?  I know you know this...

And while you're at it, check if the right and left hands are on the correct arms. 

Rinse, lather & repeat with all other elements in your AI generated designs.

As you can see, AI is very stupid with details.  It's incumbent upon you to take make sense out of AI's nonsense & blunders.  If you can't fix it, discard the image.  It's probably more trouble to fix than it's worth in royalty fees anyway. 

That's the cost of generative AI.  You win some, you lose a lot more.  And Adobe Stock doesn't give out free passes for quality errors.  Too many customers would complain.

[PaintedKitty]

Over all these would be considered fine art and not clip art. In my opinion I wold not do fine art for clip art places. People need clip art for their own put together projects such as advertising some event or product. Maybe these would be good as posters and tea shirts. Possibly to go in a on line medical magazine article.

[Abambo]

Over all these would be considered fine art and not clip art. In my opinion I wold not do fine art for clip art places. People need clip art for their own put together projects such as advertising some event or product. Maybe these would be good as posters and tea shirts. Possibly to go in a on line medical magazine article.

By @PaintedKitty

Aren't you answering the wrong thread here? There are no clip arts, and nobody here claims this to be clip art. 🙂