Rejected due to quality issues

[hardqor4ik]

Can someone explain what is wrong with these works?, as far as I'm concerned, the quality is fine here

[Jill_C]

I see some drawing errors / inconsistencies in these:

[hardqor4ik]

Of course it can be, this is the generation of AI) But it is marked as an illustration so that there are no questions about the correspondence of the image to real things

[daniellei4510]

Doesn't matter if you designated it as an illustration or photos. Inconsistencies need to be fixed before submission. 

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

That's incorrect. There is an expectation that certain details should be consistent and realistic. For instance, a person with 6 fingers isn't going to be accepted just because it's AI. 

[daniellei4510]

235: The orange in the center is poorly rendered, while the one at the top right cut off and not an entire half of an orange.

I'm on my laptop and my display isn't the best for looking at finer details but I take a look at the others when I'm in front of my desktop. But I'm sure others will chime in before then.

[hardqor4ik]

The image is generated with the help of AI, so there may be inconsistencies with reality, but for this reason I marked the image as an illustration

[daniellei4510]

I had an AI asset rejected for this, and rightfully so, which I missed prior to submission. An observant moderator who does their job will find these. That said, you will still find assets that were accepted that never should have been. Most are from the earlier days when Adobe first began accepting AI and the moderators were not trained on what to look for.

[daniellei4510]

Viewed at 200%, there are issues. If you could find, or edit, one prefect one of each kind, you could paste over these to correct them. I do this often with buttons on clothing. Again, AI does not get a pass just because it is AI. 

[daniellei4510]

These issues were difficult to spot, but I suspect the image was reject for two reasons: the frosting fades off compared to the others, and this is frosting under the arm that should be a white background like it appears on the opposite side.

[Nancy OShea]

AI is prone to many failures. It's massively imperfect at interpreting our human world with accuracy.  For this reason, AI will never fully replace human talent. 

Don't submit sub-quality images to Stock with the expectation that 'nobody will notice because it's AI.'  They will notice.  If not during Review, then later when angry customers complain and demand refunds. 

Nobody wants to buy images with obvious flaws in them.  And especially not for a million dollar commercial ad campaign.  People have lost their jobs over mistakes like that. 

Fix the problems if you can or discard the images and start over.  Submit only your highest quality work to Stock.

[Manu Prats]

Dear friend, I have to say I´m thankful for your question.
I am also having a lot of rejections because of the same issue, and now I can probably understand where are my mistakes.

I can also take advantaje to thank to other community frirends for their answers.
Cheers!