Focus seems to be a bit of a problem. I think you should increase your DOF. In this photo, I think it is too narrow.
For example the front could have more detail:
Also, you should include the whole guitar body. Composition could be improved.
IP may also be another issue.
Thank you for your quick response. I can see the depth of field, but there are so many photos with blur that I thought the effect would be ok in general, I didnt notice the front though. IP? is that the surrounding of the guitar? Thank you
IP is Intellectual Property, so this means you need a property release form. The design of the guitar could be an issue with IP.
'Intellectual property (IP) issues
If your files contain content protected by intellectual property laws, we can’t accept them. This rule is in place to protect you as well as our customers and Adobe Stock. For more information, review the Legal guidelines section of this Contributor guide.
Content protected by IP laws may appear in the image, description, title, and/or keywords. Here are some examples:
Products and objects
If they're identifiable and distinctive in visual appearance, like in their shape or color, commercial products should never be in focus and/or be the main subject of your content. This includes toys, fashion accessories, electronic devices, designer furniture, and more. Learn more
Trademark, trade dress, and intellectual property
We can't accept content that includes logos, trademarks, or company or brand names. This includes identifiable packaging or other product dress. Learn more
Locations, venues, monuments, and landmarks
Ticketed locations with paid admission often have photography restrictions. Images require property releases when they depict unique locations with distinctive features in an identifiable manner, including identifiable enclosures, installations, animals, and more. We also can’t accept content that depicts certain landmarks and monuments. It's your responsibility to find out if any photography restrictions apply. Learn more
Architecture and buildings
Modern architecture with unique building structures requires a release when it's the main focus of the image. However, depending on the specific situation, city vistas, skylines, or close-ups may be fine. Learn more
Images depicting or originating from artworks, sculptures, street art, drawings, illustrations, literature, fonts, and graphic elements are not acceptable if you didn’t create them yourself. Learn more'
Thank you, this is helpful but 😕🙃
Unless you MADE this guitar (from wood and metal) then you cannot use it for stock without permission. It's that simple; the rights belong to the guitar maker.
Does that mean all guitar photos have permission?
Whenever an identifiable object is the main focus in a photograph, you probably need a release.
Thank you Ralph
This applies to guitars, breakfast cereal boxes, cars, clothes, shoes, buildings, everything made by a human. The human owns the rights for about 100 years. It makes street photography very challenging and using guitars as props virtually impossible. If Adobe did allow a recognisable guitar without a release, then the picture could be licensed and used in an advert for (say) a rival product, or political party. The guitar maker could sue the advertiser. Who could sue Adobe, because Adobe claimed the file was free to use. And Adobe could sue YOU because you signed up saying you had complete rights to the picture.