• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Rejection due to quality

Explorer ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What needs to be done on each specific photo?

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

313

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Community Expert , Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

No idea what this is or why anyone would buy it. That said, the Histogram panel in Photoshop shows major lighting deficits.

image.png

 

This one has the the opposite lighting issue and noticeable focus problems.

image.png

 

The other ones are not Stock-worthy for reasons of poor composition, lighting and focus.

 

 

 

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

DSC_0068.jpg - depth of field is too shallow and the angle at which this object is photographed causes too much of it to be out of focus.

GOT01648.jpg - underexposed in the shadows, and I think it lacks commercial appeal

GOT01683.jpg - lens flare has caused an uneven exposure 

GOT02034.jpg - artifacts in the sky. Composition should have fully included the figures on the left side rather than cutting them off.

GOT01598.jpg - white balance is too blue 

 

 

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Out of the 5 photos posted, I looked in depth at GOT02034 and here is what I noticed:

  • One of the statues was cut off at the edge of the frame.
  • Several of the statues were blurry, likely because of a shallow depth of field.
  • The histogram reflected the image being too bright, and it was lacking contrast from my perspective.  This may be correctable by adjusting the exposure, mainly the blacks and shadows.
  • The sky is too bright and lacking detail to me.
  • There is a lot of banding and artifacts in t
...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi,

 

I assume that the pictures are technical not as good as others. The Outdoor photos are overexposed and the shadows are very dark without structure. Most Images are not have an advertising character or have no good composition.

Before you submit, please review the submission guidelines carefully and compare your work with other Stock inventory. To be accepted, your work should be as good or better than what's already represented in your keyword category.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/editing-dos-and-dont.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/vector-requirements.html
Hope that helps.

regards,
Henrik

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

No, it didn't help. I asked for specific tips for each photo. Sorry, anyone can give such general advice. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

No idea what this is or why anyone would buy it. That said, the Histogram panel in Photoshop shows major lighting deficits.

image.png

 

This one has the the opposite lighting issue and noticeable focus problems.

image.png

 

The other ones are not Stock-worthy for reasons of poor composition, lighting and focus.

 

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSC_0068.jpg - depth of field is too shallow and the angle at which this object is photographed causes too much of it to be out of focus.

GOT01648.jpg - underexposed in the shadows, and I think it lacks commercial appeal

GOT01683.jpg - lens flare has caused an uneven exposure 

GOT02034.jpg - artifacts in the sky. Composition should have fully included the figures on the left side rather than cutting them off.

GOT01598.jpg - white balance is too blue 

 

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 14, 2023 Jun 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Out of the 5 photos posted, I looked in depth at GOT02034 and here is what I noticed:

  • One of the statues was cut off at the edge of the frame.
  • Several of the statues were blurry, likely because of a shallow depth of field.
  • The histogram reflected the image being too bright, and it was lacking contrast from my perspective.  This may be correctable by adjusting the exposure, mainly the blacks and shadows.
  • The sky is too bright and lacking detail to me.
  • There is a lot of banding and artifacts in the sky.
  • There is what appears to be a red brick structure in the distance behind the statues, this would be best removed in my opinion.
  • I believe this composition of this photo isn't arranged well.  I would explore more perspectives and perhaps photograph fewer of the statues.

 

Hope that helps!


George F, Fine Art Landscape Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 15, 2023 Jun 15, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thanks for the reasoned answer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines