Technical Problems?

[Chiralli]

Dears,

please adviec why these pics had been rejected by the stock? The given reason is "some technical problems".  Thank you

[PepeCastro]

Tal vez no les gustó la composición, o consideran que las sombras no son adecuadas, personalmente  creo que por motivos personales y no tecnicos, pero no hagas mucho caso de mi opinion no soy experto

[Chiralli]

Thank you very much for your answe ☺️

[Email signature removed by moderator.]

[reedesign1912]

Are these the original photos you submitted to Adobe Stock?  I only ask because they seem small.  If they aren't the originals, could you please post them.  It is easier to give a true critique based on the originally submitted photos.

On a quick look, the peppers on the cutting board seem noisy and underexposed.  I would suggest you would do better with a slower shutter speed and a lower ISO than 1000 to reduce the noise.

I would think the other photo with the knife is also somewhat underexposed.  On a side note, you may have an IP (Intellectual Property) issue with the manufacturer's name on the knife blade.  It would be best to clone that out.

I hope this helps, but again if these aren't the original sized submitted photos, please post those for a better critique.

-Rob

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

Photo 1: some fringing arround the chili can be seen at 250%. Overexposed highlights. IP issue with the knife. Bad cropping.

Photo 2. Focus. Underexposed. Overexposed highlights.

[Chiralli]

Thank you!

[Email signature removed by moderator.]

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

I like the first one best.  But overall the lighting is uneven.  And there is a glint of extreme light on the knife guard that needs attention.  Keep working at it.  

[Chiralli]

Great! Thank you! Didn’t pay attention to that

[Email signature removed by moderator.]

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

For me also, the lighting is rather bad - it is uneven. The composition can also be improved.

[FRLI]

It's somewhat random in my opinion. They told us that we should not be offended when our images get rejected. I just live with the fact that 50% of my images get rejected for whatever reason.

love your images.

[Nancy OShea]

Technical issues are not random. You may not be seeing the problems for lack of thorough inspection.  Or perhaps your eye is not trained enough yet.

Examine images at 100  - 300% magnification, that's when technical issues are most noticeable.  All images are evaluated the same for composition, framing, lighting, focus, details, color saturation, white balance and unwanted artifacts. In time, you'll get a feel for what needs correcting.

[Abambo]

It's somewhat random in my opinion. They told us that we should not be offended when our images get rejected. I just live with the fact that 50% of my images get rejected for whatever reason.

By FRLI

Rejections are not random. If you are at 50% rejection rate after having submitted 20-30 pictures, you didn't get it. You need to improve your acceptance rate with time. I simply try not to submit bad pictures, just to see, if they may pass…

As for the pictures presented here: I've seen worse, but still, they have problems. And the issues are detectable: for example the shadows on the second image, light in general on these images. And I didn't even download the pictures. Putting a little more effort into those pictures, and they will pass.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Chiralli]

Thank you for your time! Will work with them more 

[moderator deleted e-mail signature, please don't respond by e-mail if your provider adds a signature by default]