Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi guys!
I have recently uploaded my 2nd batch of 10 images, and this time were all rejected. 😱
My first batch of images were about graphics birds and were All accepted, sooner than I thought and I was very excited.
But this time, I don't know what went wrong with these images. I am really sad because I spend more than 2 hours for each image in photoshop, to correct and edit them for perfection.
They are Ai images and very high quality @ 300dpi. I removed artifacts, noise, etc... I hope it is not about the lighting, because I want them that way in low lighting the concept.
What else left to do? 😭
On the Upload, I choose Photos instead of “illustration”. Is that a problem?
I really need your feedback, guys.
I uploaded some of my images:
AI is imperfect and will never replace real artists. At best, AI is a tool. But tools don't make quality artwork, people do.
Examine work closely at 100-300% magnfication and fix all errors if you can or discard them and start over.
Compare your best work with current Stock inventory. See examples.
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=argue%20couple
https://stock.adobe.com/au/images/young-couple-having-quarrel/238431483
There are many, many AI images of people in the database. Some are photo-realistic, and some are more illustrative. The moderators are going to scrutinize those people carefully, looking for errors in eyes, mouths, teeth, hair, hands, feet, etc. You can generate realistic looking people with AI tools, but many of those still require editing to fix minor issues. If you don't have the skill to do that editing effectively, you should steer away from trying to generate people images.
I've been doing AI for over a year and I can give you some simple tips:
1) multiple people equals multiple problems
2) people pictured full length means more area for the AI bot to render poorly
3) if you're doing indoor rooms, minimalism is key; more objects mean more work
4) I wouldn't worry about creating "atmosphere" in Photoshop; let the buyer do that to their liking, or include a description of the effect you are looking for in your prompt
Whatever you create, one way or the other, needs to be “perfect”. If the viewer does not see that your asset is an illustration, they assume it's a photo. If the assets are what you produce, then you need to live with a high rejection rate, as moderators will look at the assets similarly as we do. Some are more stringent than others, but it should be quite consistent.
Yes, the forum is converting them slightly more blurrier than they are. I've noticed that.
But thanks for the comment.
By @eurosGRAPHIX
No, when you download and view in Photoshop, they do not get changed. If you look at them in the browser, the browser may transform them. My Browser here on my iPad is at 85%, my browser on my desktop with a 4k screen is at 150%. It's the browser transforming the pictures for that. The browser is not an accurate pixel machine.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I see this happen a lot with AI, where you can almost imagine what the bot is thinking or trying to comprehend, while doing its best to follow instructions but ultimately getting it all wrong. "Let's see...they're moving in, so I'll want to add some moving boxes, so I'll have the woman holding a purse that looks like a moving box."
I once asked my bot to "imagine an image of two beautiful twin sisters" and it gave me a pair of identical siamese cats. Giving instructions to a text to image AI bot is sometimes like trying to communicate with a five year old.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
AI is imperfect and will never replace real artists. At best, AI is a tool. But tools don't make quality artwork, people do.
Examine work closely at 100-300% magnfication and fix all errors if you can or discard them and start over.
Compare your best work with current Stock inventory. See examples.
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=argue%20couple
https://stock.adobe.com/au/images/young-couple-having-quarrel/238431483
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Nancy OShea,
Thank you for your feedback and your tips.
You are right. Ai will never be perfect or replace real artists. Yes, my mistake was that I gave all my attention to the people that are the main subject, I created missing hands (fingers), legs, faces, etc... And I skipped most of the surrounding objects, which I considered them not to be that important in the background. My mistake.
Probably I should not try to do such complex images in the future again. Such complicated and difficult scenes. I will do more simpler images and with less clutter.
I also should have chosen the "illustrations" instead of the "Photo" option.
I wanted my images to look fake as illustrations and not real photos. I wanted them to look like painted, or graphic images, Not an actual photo.
The images example you send me are minimal, and they are real photos. Not illustrations.
But you are right. I got your point. There are many mistakes I need to erase and correct.
Thank you. 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
#2 Happy Couple: random lights seemingly floating in space, that odd looking object in the back right corner, the weird vase or whatever in the left foreground, the woman's weird hand with the pointy fingers
#4 young couple: I started looking for things, then I began feeling like I was playing a "find the hidden objects" game. There is just so much going on here that doesn't make sense: unidentifiable objects, the man's hand, that red dish or lamp shade or whatever it is hanging from a pole in the background. And what are all those objects on top of the crates?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That's definitely blurry.
Pictures are not changed by the forum, so when you download and take them to Photoshop, they will have the original quality:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, the forum is converting them slightly more blurrier than they are. I've noticed that.
But thanks for the comment.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, the forum is converting them slightly more blurrier than they are. I've noticed that.
But thanks for the comment.
By @eurosGRAPHIX
No, when you download and view in Photoshop, they do not get changed. If you look at them in the browser, the browser may transform them. My Browser here on my iPad is at 85%, my browser on my desktop with a 4k screen is at 150%. It's the browser transforming the pictures for that. The browser is not an accurate pixel machine.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is why I almost always download images prior to commenting on them, unless the issue is something that jumps out at me immediately as an obvious error. Same with my MacBook Air. It's not a pro laptop by any means and the display is adequite for VIEWING images, but not for fair and honest critiques.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
These are too dark for professional print process.