Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello everyone!
The attached image was rejected with the following "Possible reasons":
- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.
- Undeclared Generative AI Content.
- Content not compliant with overall guidelines
And yet I declared the Generative AI Content (even if it's only a part of the process), and I didn't use any artist's name (except mine) in the description.
Could it be that the image may LOOK AS if it was by another artist? E.g. "Ah, that looks like an Escher work! Rejected!" Could some sort of AI guess a prompt from the image and decide it contains an artist name?
Or am I missing some other overall guideline?
Thank you!
No, it looks as if you signed your work:
That's a non-compliant refusal.
The stock text only shows some of the possible reasons.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I didn't think Adobe accepted public domain images. But now I'm wiser :0) But then it beats me why they are editorial.
By @Festive_epicness157F
Adobe does accept assets where the submitter controls 100% of the image or has releases that give them that control.
If you are talking about a specific asset, you need to include a link to that asset.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What does 100 percent control over the images mean?