Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I was searching for "youth law" and came across a number of disturbing videos and images of young boys wearing very little clothing (or none) and in many they are acting or placed into in suggestive poses or inappropriate actions. I could not see a method to report them. Why would anything like this be allowed on the site? It is stomach-churning. These are just some examples but there are many:
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=289511543
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=118906703
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=95320224
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=537972496
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=298665568
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=373244610
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=115578231
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=424403239
@Laurel2330145962oe - thanks for reaching out. I will forward it to the appropriate team for review.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Maybe @Liza5C0C can have a look at these.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Laurel2330145962oe - thanks for reaching out. I will forward it to the appropriate team for review.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I appreciate the images being looked into. In my opinion there should be better filtering of what content is being added to the site. Especially content containing children. These images are not explicit but they're intentionally suggestive.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
there is nothing wrong with what i just saw if you thank that they are bad [insult removed by moderator] they are only models that most likely had permisson to be recorded there is nothing wrong with its all legal
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There is no reason for you to insult the original poster and call her "sick in the head". There are different cultural standards around being partially unclothed, even for children. I found a couple of those images to be slightly suggestive, and certainly if it was my child I would not have approved having those be available for licensing and being used in ways over which I had no control. Moderators have to make a judgment call on every image they evaluate, and sometimes they get it wrong. It's worth having them take another look.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The slow motion is a little off-putting, but when viewed on an individual basis, it's not that difficult to imagine most of these used in the context of legitimate material.
I have a photography friend--a grandmother--who years ago took some photographs of her two or three-year old granddaughter taking a bath. She had them developed at one of those little one-hour print shops that we no longer see since the advent of digital photography. They were innocent photographs. Nevertheless, the shop owner or clerk reported the images to authorities and she spent years--and some jail time--before finally being declared innocent of any wrongdoing. She even wrote a book about her ordeal, but I'm sure it is long out of print.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[insult removed by moderator]
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
cry cry