• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
Locked
1

Inappropriate Content of Underage Boys in Stock Photos

New Here ,
Sep 12, 2023 Sep 12, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I was searching for "youth law" and came across a number of disturbing videos and images of young boys wearing very little clothing (or none) and in many they are acting or placed into in suggestive poses or inappropriate actions. I could not see a method to report them. Why would anything like this be allowed on the site? It is stomach-churning. These are just some examples but there are many:

 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=289511543

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=118906703

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=95320224 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=537972496 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=298665568 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=373244610 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=115578231 

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/search/video?k=boy&asset_id=424403239 

TOPICS
Asset Quality

Views

427

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Sep 12, 2023 Sep 12, 2023

@Laurel2330145962oe - thanks for reaching out. I will forward it to the appropriate team for review. 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Sep 12, 2023 Sep 12, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Maybe @Liza5C0C can have a look at these.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Sep 12, 2023 Sep 12, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Laurel2330145962oe - thanks for reaching out. I will forward it to the appropriate team for review. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 14, 2023 Sep 14, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I appreciate the images being looked into. In my opinion there should be better filtering of what content is being added to the site. Especially content containing children. These images are not explicit but they're intentionally suggestive.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 16, 2023 Sep 16, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

there  is  nothing  wrong  with  what  i  just  saw    if  you  thank  that  they  are  bad  [insult removed by moderator]     they  are  only  models  that  most   likely  had   permisson to     be  recorded     there   is  nothing    wrong  with   its  all    legal 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 16, 2023 Sep 16, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

There is no reason for you to insult the original poster and call her "sick in the head". There are different cultural standards around being partially unclothed, even for children. I found a couple of those images to be slightly suggestive, and certainly if it was my child I would not have approved having those be available for licensing and being used in ways over which I had no control. Moderators have to make a judgment call on every image they evaluate, and sometimes they get it wrong. It's worth having them take another look. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 16, 2023 Sep 16, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

The slow motion is a little off-putting, but when viewed on an individual basis, it's not that difficult to imagine most of these used in the context of legitimate material.

I have a photography friend--a grandmother--who years ago took some photographs of her two or three-year old granddaughter taking a bath. She had them developed at one of those little one-hour print shops that we no longer see since the advent of digital photography. They were innocent photographs. Nevertheless, the shop owner or clerk reported the images to authorities and she spent years--and some jail time--before finally being declared innocent of any wrongdoing. She even wrote a book about her ordeal, but I'm sure it is long out of print. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 16, 2023 Sep 16, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

[insult removed by moderator]

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 16, 2023 Sep 16, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

cry   cry

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Resources
Buy Adobe Stock
Getting Started