I'm thinking about buying an extended license. It's for cover photos of music album. The information that can be included in the album's cover photo is very closed. The picture copyright holder cannot be specified. And the music copyright holder is specified. Is it a violation of the terms and conditions?
It may be that you have difficulties to understand the terms of the licence, but it that is the case, you will need to ask counsel with a lawyer specialized in licensing. Adobe won't jump in and tell you if this is OK or not because any commitment from an Adobe employee would bind the company. That's the reason the licensing terms as such are published, and you will find guidelines on the Adobe stock site.
Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788 (Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer