I wish the gradient map tool was like the one in photoshop or designer

I had an additional idea for a visual improvement to the gradient filter. In my opinion, the gradient filter would benefit from a visual representation of colors in a histogram, similar to the levels layer. This would allow users to quickly pinpoint where the values are, making it easier to iterate efficiently. Naturally, the histogram would need to adapt based on the chosen blending method, such as blending in linear or other alternatives, to accurately reflect those changes.

I think this would be an exceptional upgrade to the existing gradient filter. Please let me know if you’ve seen my suggestion, as I would be highly interested in seeing this implemented. Otherwise, I might create a separate thread to ensure it gets noticed.

Regarding the colors looking washed out, is it possible that you are overlooking the "Blend Color in Linear" option? I've made this mistake in the past, and I noticed in the images you've posted that it is set to "True." As for the gradient filter, I think a visual overhaul would be beneficial, and perhaps the "Blend in Linear" option should default to "False." An option for image input would also be useful for those who utilize them.

I think Blender, with its Color Ramp node, serves as a good example of how the filter could be improved. The UI is compact, provides a visual option along with specific values for positioning, and includes an option to cycle through selected colors in order, along with additional options for color mode and interpolation.

Thanks for the details.

The steps issue seems to be a matter of bitdepth. It's worth a try to switch the bitdepth for 16 bits and see if the problem persists.

Also, if not already done, I advise you to always check the colors with the 3D view displayed as "Base Color" instead of "Material". This way, you'll have a more realistic vision on how the gradient is applied.

I've color-picked the exact same colors. And you can clearly see how the SP one feels a bit grayer and less saturated. You can also see how the furr details looks diffrent.

Here you can clearly see how the shadows behave diffrently

Thank you for looking into the issue Cyril!

This is a comparison of how it looks with just three colors in the gradent. It's imposible to get the same contrast and vibrancy in the colors in Painter as in photoshop 😞 You can clearly see in the transistions from one color to the other how there is clear steps in painter while in photoshop there's a smooth transition.

Aslo the darkest and the brightes color kind of disapears. If I try to get them back by pulling in the sliders the steps between colors gets worse. Here's another comparison, side by side SP and PS. I've done the exact same thing in the two softwares here. I've pulled up the darkest hue and down the brightest one to get more contrast in the gradent.

Hi Lotta, hello Leslie,

Thanks for the detailed insight.

I can agree that the gradient isn't very intuitive to use, and it could be a bit more visual. With that being said, I'm not sure what you meant mentioning choppy transitions and washed out colors. Could you share a screenshot of the issue, so I can take a better look on what you're mentioning.

I'll share your message with the team, so we can have a discussion on the subject.

Best regards,

+1 i`ve been requesting this since 2015
https://polycount.com/discussion/154264/substance-painter-gradientmap
i was happy to at least get the filter version but its so much less user friendly than an actual gradient with control points