Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Exit
Harm_Millaard
LEGEND
Harm_Millaard
LEGEND
Activity
‎May 12, 2013
10:00 AM
Andy, There is another complication to this situation. No backward compatibility between projects, only forward. Take this situation: You start with CS5.5 and create several projects. Fine. You upgrade to CS6 and update your projects to CS6. Still fine, because you still have CS5.5 for re-editing the original CS5.5 projects AND re-edit with CS6 versions as well. You upgrade to CC7 and update your projects to CC7 and add new ones. Now you are in a pile of trouble. You can't stop your subscription, because your CC7 projects are not backward compatible with CS6. You have to pay the 50% of non-paid months when ending your subscription and the discretionary price Adobe charges. You lose access to everything you created with CC7. This would not be a problem if a CS7 upgrade were offered. Then you would retain the possibility to edit all CS5.5, CS6 AND CS7 projects whenever you want. You would still have the problem of backward compatibility, but you can access all three versions all the time and not be the victim of Adobe greed. For perpetual licenses the upgrade policies have already been tightened, you can only upgrade from CS5 and higher, no longer from CS3 or CS4, but if you join the CC Crowd, you can still profit from the 12-month reduced pricing from CS3 and up. It is clear where they want to go. This raises another question, why are CS3 owners, who skipped CS4, CS5 and CS5.5 upgrades, treated equally? Is that right? It does not feel that way.
... View more
‎May 12, 2013
09:14 AM
Sorry, I made a calculation error in my previous post. It should read: Year 1 in Denmark: $ 432 (CS6) or $ 576 (CS5.5 or lower) Year 2 in Denmark: $ 968 or $ 2916 Year 2 and stopping after 2 months: 2 x $ 81 plus $ 405 = $ 567 Year 2 and stopping after 2 months and after Adobe's discretionary price increase: 2 x $ 243 + $ 1215 = $ 1701. Total cost for 14 months of CC from CS6: $ 999 from CS6 (no price increases) Total cost for 14 months of CC from CS5.5: $ 1143 from CS5.5 (no price increases) Total cost for 14 months of CC from CS6: $ 2133 from CS6 (with tripled prices) Total cost for 14 months of CC from CS5.5: $ 2277 from CS5.5 (with tripled prices) Total cost for 24 months of CC from CS6: $ 1404 from CS6 (no price increases) Total cost for 24 months of CC from CS5.5: $ 1548 from CS5.5 (no price increases) Total cost for 24 months of CC from CS6: $ 3348 from CS6 (with tripled prices) Total cost for 24 months of CC from CS5.5: $ 3492 from CS5.5 (with tripled prices) For comparison, the upgrade from CS5.5 to CS6 with a perpetual license is $ 525 in the US. And the time from CS6 to CC7 is 14 months.
... View more
‎May 12, 2013
07:41 AM
See: In Denmark, the first year of an upgrade from CS will cost you $ 48 per month or $ 36 for upgrades from CS6 only. After that first year, the monthly cost rises to $ 81 per month, or $ 968 per year (at least at this moment, because Adobe can increase prices at any moment as they wish and their only obligation is to notify you in advance, even if by some whim they decide to triple the price). If you stop somewhere during that second year, so still have to pay 50% of the non-paid monthes, even though your license is suspended immediately. Hypothetical situation: First year: 12 x $ 36 when upgrading from CS6, total $ 432, or 12 x $ 48 when upgrading from CS3/4/5/5.5, total $ 576. Second year without price increases: 12 x $ 81 = $ 968, After tripling the prices (and nobody can do anything about Adobe's whimsical behaviour): 12 x $ 243 = $ 2916 If you consider that too expensive, and decide to stop after two months, you still pay 50% of the not yet paid amounts, so at least 10 x $ 81 x 0.5 = $ 405 without price increases, but after tripling the price even a whopping 10 x $243 x 0.5 = $ 2430. Nothing you can do about that, it is all laid down in the terms. It does not matter that your license is immediately revoked, you can no longer access your copywrited material, you still have to bleed. Abode cares for its cu$tomer$, but even more for their ca$h flow and profit$.
... View more
‎May 10, 2013
02:16 PM
Kevin, The AVCHD spanning bug still might get fixed, but right now we don't know. It's a very difficult one. As of now, I am still advocating for this fix. This does not really give me any confidence in Adobe giving it sufficient attention. It might or it might not be fixed. It is over a year, just like some bugs I reported early in the CS6 cycle. Mark informed me they were being deferred to CS8 or later. The caching bugs are still there. Other bugs that Bill and I reported were marked as solved when they weren't and are now marked again as to be reviewed. I'm losing my confidence in Adobe and the capability to solve bugs, unfortunately.
... View more
‎May 10, 2013
01:10 PM
Steven, I agree with you. To make the situation a bit simpler, see: The problem is that there is no exit-strategy. What if you already paid two years of 'rental' and decide to get out? You can't. You can no longer access your own copywrited work. A rather simple solution would be to give the following options to customers: Buy CS7 and pay the full amount. Get a CCM subscription for one year. After one year, you can choose to: Renew your CCM subscription for another year, or Buy out of the rental model, buy the full CS7 version at full price, minus X % of paid rental amounts. After another year offer the same options, etc. That could be a nice exit strategy for both Adobe and customers, but they first have to solve the pricing disparity in various countries.
... View more
‎May 09, 2013
04:32 PM
Kevin, Steve Hoeg and Dennis Radeke have been informed about this issue a long time ago. Ask either of them for the login details to our site where there is a special CS6 Debug page which shows what the buffering does. Basically it boils down to a performance degradation of around 200% with AME and MPEG2-DVD exports. It has not yet been solved and that is why we warn people about the differences in caching algorithms and the interpretation of benchmark results.
... View more
‎May 08, 2013
02:35 PM
Not really. First of all, it is $ 81 per month in Europe or around $ 1,000 per year. You have paid your rent for three years or nearly $ 3,000 and you are still left in the dust if you don't continue your subscription to CC. I rather pay around € 1,200 once for the same software with a perpetual licence in a boxed version that still allows me to use the software after three years or even $ 900 if I buy it in the US. The better solution is to deduct all 'rental payments' from the purchase price. Say you rent for one year, and then decide to purchase a perpetual license, you pay the full price of the boxed version, but deduct the paid rentals. In the case of European customers that means € 1200 minus 12 x € 61.50 after one year, so a balloon payment of € 462. That would be somewhat fair if you disregard the 62% markup / thievery that Adobe punishes European customers with.
... View more
‎May 08, 2013
11:17 AM
Yeah, it definitely seems like Europe is getting screwed over a little. Which is weird b/c Australia seems to be getting a killer deal. More than a little IMO. See http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1207459?tstart=30
... View more
‎May 08, 2013
11:10 AM
Kevin, I can't disagree more. Probably not everyone, sure, but I think that if video editors would try it for one year they would really like it. Not when Adobe charges 62% more for the same software, the same delivery format and the same validation methods, just because I live in a different country. Now, if you start by giving me a 70% rebate on your prices, I may be willing to try it, but not with the current thievery.
... View more
‎May 08, 2013
08:48 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67Iw9q2X9cU
... View more
‎May 08, 2013
08:44 AM
You should turn off all power saving settings and sleep modes when editing. One of the advantages of a laptop is that you can't use a battery, only a wall outlet. 36 hours is not too bad for a system with those specs. Of course on a decent desktop it would be around 30 minutes, but you wanted a laptop, so suffer the consequences.
... View more
‎Apr 26, 2013
03:34 AM
No.
... View more
‎Apr 22, 2013
02:14 PM
You did not tell (as usual) and Shakespeare did not know about MPE versus MGE.
... View more
‎Apr 22, 2013
01:53 PM
Tell me.
... View more
‎Apr 22, 2013
01:27 PM
Alex, thanks for showing me the difference between MPE (Mercury Playback Engine) and the MGE (Mercury Graphics Engine). However, I was talking about MPE, not MGE.
... View more
‎Apr 22, 2013
11:30 AM
Congrats. Good choice and happy editing.
... View more
‎Apr 21, 2013
06:03 AM
Quadro's are overpriced and underperforming. It is a protected brand of nVidia and they steal you blind with their A-brand reputation. It is their cash-cow. I have yet to find a Maximus configuration for a whopping $ 6K come even close to a GTX 680 that only costs $ 500. The ONLY reason to choose a Quadro card is when you really NEED 10 bit output to equally exorbitant 10-bit monitors. You may want to have a look at http://ppbm7.com/index.php/news and scroll down to see a limited comparison of video cards and their performance with PR. If you have the choice between a GTX 560 Ti and a GTX 660, I would go for the 660, because it consumes less power, runs quieter and can steer up to 4 monitors.
... View more
‎Apr 20, 2013
11:35 PM
No doubt the GTX 560 Ti is way faster, It has double the cores, double the memory bus width and the memory bandwidth is about 4.5 times higher. Even the GTX 550 TI is faster than the Quadro K600, even though it is around 50% less expensive.
... View more
‎Apr 20, 2013
12:53 AM
Alain, The GTX 680 does everything the FX 3800 does, only significantly faster. Neat, Mercalli, Twixtor are all CPU bound and are not accelerated. Same for PS and LR. Only AE and PR profit from hardware accelerated MPE.
... View more
‎Apr 19, 2013
11:55 AM
Changing this line: echo printf("ID: '%s', Total: '%d', RPI: '%d', Disk: '%d', MPEG: '%d', H264: '%d', MPE: '%d' ", $record[0], $record[1], $record[2], $record[3], $record[4], $record[5], $record[6]); to echo sprintf("ID: '%s', Total: '%d', RPI: '%d', Disk: '%d', MPEG: '%d', H264: '%d', MPE: '%d'<br /> ", $record[0], $record[1], $record[2], $record[3], $record[4], $record[5], $record[6]); solved the mysterious RED figures and the addition of the <br /> made it much more readable. At least I now know that the query works. Next step is to figure out a way to display the results of this .php page to show a lightbox view of the selected record in a fabrik list in detail view like this: based on the record selected, with the figures as shown in the previous post. So they should be dynamic. In this example: ID: mystery name-3930K OC, Total: 75, RPI: 79, Disk: 65, MPEG: 88, H264: 79, MPE: 75 Selecting a different record with different numbers should then adjust the graphs or gauges accordingly. Or, in a slightly different layout:
... View more
‎Apr 19, 2013
08:50 AM
I'm probably making a stupid mistake with regard to point 1. I have this .php code: <?php mysql_select_db($database_mysql, $mysql); $query_count='SELECT(COUNT(*)-1) AS number FROM Personal_data WHERE Version LIKE 6.0 AND MPE_On >= 1'; $count=mysql_query($query_count, $mysql) or die(mysql_error()); $query_recordset1='SELECT computer_ID, 100-(nr-1)*(100/144) AS Ranking, 100-(nr_rpi-1)*(100/144) AS RPI, 100-(nr_disk-1)*(100/144) AS Disk, 100-(nr_mpeg-1)*(100/144) AS MPEG, 100-(nr_h264-1)*(100/144) AS H264, 100-(nr_mpe-1)*(100/144) AS MP FROM `Personal_data` WHERE Version LIKE 6.0 AND MPE_On >= 1 ORDER BY nr ASC'; $recordset1=mysql_query($query_recordset1, $mysql) or die(mysql_error()); while ($record=mysql_fetch_array($recordset1, MYSQL_NUM)){ echo printf("ID: '%s', Total: '%d', RPI: '%d', Disk: '%d', MPEG: '%d', H264: '%d', MPE: '%d' ", $record[0], $record[1], $record[2], $record[3], $record[4], $record[5], $record[6]); } mysql_free_result($recordset1); ?> I was hoping that using a variable $count or even 'number' would solve the issue, but it does not work. As soon as I replace: 100/144 by 100/$count I get an error that $count is not a column name and when replacing it with 100/number I only get 0 as a result. In the second place, I get these echo printf results when checking the correctness of the query: ID: 'Harms Monster', Total: '100', RPI: '100', Disk: '100', MPEG: '100', H264: '100', MPE: '100' 97ID: 'Asrock X79 Extreme 9', Total: '99', RPI: '98', Disk: '88', MPEG: '93', H264: '97', MPE: '99' 98ID: 'Magnus EDIT3 4.6GHz', Total: '98', RPI: '97', Disk: '97', MPEG: '97', H264: '93', MPE: '98' 97ID: 'RFD 2012', Total: '97', RPI: '97', Disk: '95', MPEG: '89', H264: '89', MPE: '97' 86ID: 'Extreme 9 GTX TITAN ', Total: '97', RPI: '99', Disk: '98', MPEG: '99', H264: '98', MPE: '97' 98ID: etc. In some mysterious way the RED figures are added to the echo statement and they should not be there. For readability it would be nice to add a CRLF to the printf string, so each record is on a new line.
... View more
‎Apr 10, 2013
02:32 PM
Adobe is aware of the problem with GoPro Hero3 footage and they are working on it. I don't know anything more than that, but it has their attention.
... View more
‎Apr 05, 2013
11:48 AM
Due to my lack of expertise with MySQL I have two rather basic questions. I use this query to give me the results I need, but I have to adjust the bold figures manually: SELECT computer_ID, 100 - ( nr -1) * (100/157), 100 - (nr_rpi - 1)*(100/157), ... FROM xyz WHERE Version LIKE 6.0 ORDER BY nr The problem is the number 157. Ideally this should read 'COUNT(*)-1' or 'MAX(nr)-1'. But somehow this only gives me a single row, not the complete list. What I need to do is change absolute rankings on different variables to a scale of 0 to 100. I have - in this example - rankings from 1 to 158 (1 being top) and I need to adjust them to a scale of 100 (100 being top) to 0. What do I need to change in this query? I need to generate the rankings used above and currently I use manual labor to create these, but obviously it is far from ideal. This is what I use to manually generate these ranking figures: First empty Benchmark_results. Then get rank for total time: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY total_time, crpi, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 Now update rank for total time: UPDATE Personal_data, Benchmark_results SET Personal_data.nr=Benchmark_results.RankCS6 WHERE Benchmark_results.Ref_ID=Personal_data.Ref_ID AND Personal_data.Version LIKE 6.0 Now empty Benchmark_results again and repeat for crpi: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY crpi, total_time, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 Now update rank for crpi only: UPDATE Personal_data, Benchmark_results SET Personal_data.nr_rpi=Benchmark_results.nr_rpi WHERE Benchmark_results.Ref_ID=Personal_data.Ref_ID AND Personal_data.Version LIKE 6.0 Now repeat for Disk_io: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY Diskio, crpi, total_time, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 And update rank for Diskio: UPDATE Personal_data, Benchmark_results SET Personal_data.nr_disk=Benchmark_results.nr_disk WHERE Benchmark_results.Ref_ID=Personal_data.Ref_ID AND Personal_data.Version LIKE 6.0 Repeat for dvd: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY dvd, crpi, total_time, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 And update rank for dvd: UPDATE Personal_data, Benchmark_results SET Personal_data.nr_mpeg=Benchmark_results.nr_dvd WHERE Benchmark_results.Ref_ID=Personal_data.Ref_ID AND Personal_data.Version LIKE 6.0 Repeat for h264: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY h264, crpi, total_time, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 And update rank for h264: UPDATE Personal_data, Benchmark_results SET Personal_data.nr_h264=Benchmark_results.nr_h264 WHERE Benchmark_results.Ref_ID=Personal_data.Ref_ID AND Personal_data.Version LIKE 6.0 Now clean up again: Insert into Benchmark_results(Rank, RankCS6, nr_rpi, nr_disk, nr_dvd, nr_h264, Ref_ID, Total, RPI, Gain) SELECT @rank:=@rank+1 AS Rank, @Nr:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr+1 ELSE @Nr END AS RankCS6, @Nr_rpi:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_rpi+1 ELSE @Nr_rpi END AS nr_rpi, @Nr_disk:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_disk+1 ELSE @Nr_disk END AS nr_disk, @Nr_mpeg:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_mpeg+1 ELSE @Nr_mpeg END AS nr_dvd, @Nr_h264:=CASE WHEN Version LIKE 6.0 THEN @Nr_h264+1 ELSE @Nr_h264 END AS nr_h264, Ref_ID, Diskio+dvd+h264+IFNULL(MPE_On,MPE_Off) As Total, FORMAT((50.893*Diskio+158.333*dvd+77.027*h264+950*IFNULL(MPE_On,MPE_Off))/12138.0,4) As RPI, FORMAT(MPE_Off/IFNULL(MPE_On,MPE_Off),3) As Gain FROM Personal_data, (SELECT @rank:=0, @Nr:=0, @Nr_rpi:=0, @Nr_disk:=0, @Nr_mpeg:=0, @Nr_h264:=0 AS i) AS i WHERE 1 ORDER BY total_time, crpi, cgain ASC LIMIT 0, 5000 This of course is far from ideal, but the only way I figured out that works, but among you geniuses there must be someone who can help me optimize this workflow and I'm open to all suggestions.
... View more
‎Mar 31, 2013
05:17 AM
I have numerous XML files, one for each record, with a structure like this (only a small part actually, each file is around 170 KB): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <speccydata version="1.20.446" formatversion="2.0" languageID="0" time="20130323T222711" localtime="20130323T232711+0100"> <mainsection title="Summary"> <section title="Operating System" id="1"> <entry value="Microsoft Windows 8 Enterprise 64-bit" /> </section> <section title="CPU" id="2"> <entry title="Intel Core i7 3930K @ 3.20GHz" value="32 °C" /> <entry title="Sandy Bridge-E 32nm Technology" value="" /> </section> <section title="RAM" id="3"> <entry value="64,0 GB DDR3 @ 1091MHz (11-11-11-31)" /> </section> <section title="Motherboard" id="4"> <entry title="ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. P9X79 WS (LGA2011)" value="25 °C" /> </section> <section title="Graphics" id="5"> <entry title="SyncMaster (1920x1080@60Hz)" value="" /> <entry title="SyncMaster (1920x1080@60Hz)" value="" /> <entry title="24W_LCD_TV (1920x1080@50Hz)" value="" /> <entry title="Microsoft Basic Render Driver" value="" /> <entry title="NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680" value="" /> </section> <section title="Hard Drives" id="6"> <entry title="238GB Corsair Performance Pro (SSD)" value="" /> <entry title="238GB Corsair Performance Pro (SSD)" value="" /> <entry title="932GB Seagate ST1000NM0011 (SATA)" value="24 °C" /> <entry title="16764GB Areca ARC-1882-VOL#000 SCSI Disk Device (RAID)" value="" /> </section> <section title="Optical Drives" id="7"> <entry title="HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH10LS38" value="" /> <entry title="HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH10LS38" value="" /> </section> <section title="Audio" id="8"> <entry title="Realtek High Definition Audio" value="" /> </section> </mainsection> <mainsection title="Operating System" id="1"> <entry> <entry title="Model" value="MS Windows 8" /> <entry title="Edition" value="Enterprise" /> <entry title="Architecture" value="64-bit" /> <entry title="Service Pack" value="" /> </entry> I have a table in MySQL, where each record contains the name of the .XML file in a field. I need to open the .XML file and load relevant data into a specific field for record 1, then repeat for record 2, until all records are filled with the data from the various .XML files. As an example from the above .XML code, I want to extract the BOLD information and get it into fields called: os, cpu, ram, mobo, graphics, hard_drives, etc. How to do that?
... View more
‎Mar 17, 2013
04:38 AM
Have a look here: Intro Part 1
... View more
‎Mar 14, 2013
02:58 PM
Allow users full administrator rights and allow them to store locally looks like the best approach. They can upload to the server after they have finished editing.
... View more
‎Mar 06, 2013
04:10 AM
I'm not saying we will get proxies in the next release, but asking for them is perfectly OK and sensible. I second that. Recently I tested a 4 camera GoPro multicam project on my 'Monster' and it was jerky and choppy like hell. OK, this is a typical CS6 problem, so maybe in the future this will be solved, but in a number of cases and especially with systems that are not as extravagant as my own system, it makes a lot of sense to use proxy editing. Edius has a nice workflow for that and I think Adobe does well to copy that functionality in their suite as well.
... View more
‎Feb 17, 2013
07:49 AM
Contact Adobe.
... View more
Copyright © 2025 Adobe. All rights reserved.
AdChoices