Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Exit
jonathand80819138
Explorer
jonathand80819138
Explorer
Activity
‎Mar 03, 2023
08:29 AM
Had the same issue, working with version 23.2.0 of PR....my Automatically Link Other Files was checked off by default, but it wasn't doing it. I unchecked it and rechecked it, and presto it started working again....weird.
... View more
‎Aug 10, 2020
01:13 PM
1 Upvote
So, I've produced a few video spots for web delivery in a 29.97 fps sequence 48kHz sample rate. In addition to the video, some vendors request an audio only file that needs to be a MP3 file with a 44.1kHz sample rate. So, I duplicate the sequence, change the audio settings to 44.1kHz, and export out the MP3. Upon export the resulting file is alsways slighly stretched...maybe only 67 milliseconds or so. What's casuing this? Anything I can do in my work flow to fix the result? I've testing taking the final video file into audion and kicking out an MP3 file and the resulitng file is exactly 30 secs as desired.
... View more
‎Jul 24, 2020
03:06 PM
I don't use captions very often, in fact it's been maybe a year or more since I used the tradition open and closed caption features within PP. Well, recently I went to use them and it was frustrating to say the least. Did I miss something, and did PP overhaul them? I also went ahead and opened an old project from about a year ago that I had used an open caption layer and upon opening, the caption layer wasn't even visible in the monitor. Once I poked around and got them to show up, the sizing and placement of the text was all over the place and way wrong. Sorry if I've been way out of the loop on this, but has anyone had a similar experience?
... View more
‎Jul 15, 2020
11:43 AM
1 Upvote
Very cool. And let's say you're making resizes...going from 16x9 and needing versions of 1x1 and 9x16 for example, is there a way to calculate size and placement of graphics relative to the canvas size...as appose to having to manually go in and move this around like we do now?
... View more
‎Jul 15, 2020
10:25 AM
Curious if anyone has experience creating really customizable, automated video templates within AE. I know of the scripts "CompsFromspreadsheet," and "Templater," but I don't have any experiecene using them. Every tutuorial i've seen mostly deals with swapping in / automating text replacements. I'm wondering if anyone has experience automating differenet versions of ad where you'd need to replace not only text, but images, videos, colors etc.?
... View more
‎Apr 27, 2020
10:10 PM
Thanks. Yea, I just did a test clip, and while all the media info is correct, when I watch it frame by frame in quicktime there still appears to be a duplicate frame like every 4th or 5th frame. I'd imagine it'll get flagged still. But I could be wrong.
... View more
‎Apr 27, 2020
08:54 PM
I recorded a screen capture using the software iShowU. I set it to capture at 29.976fps, but when it kicked out the files each was different...anywhere from 25 to 30 fps and in between which tells me the record was variable? I think there was an option to re-encode correctly to 29.976 after each clip was logged, but I didn't realize that until we were done. I'm editing in a 29.97 sequence, but obvisouly have all sorts of random duplicate frames scattered around. I need to kick the final video out for HULU and they ONLY take videos edited natively at 23.976 or 29.976.....so I'm in a bad spot......what are my options for correcting the frame rates to 29.976 so that HULU won't reject my ad?
... View more
‎Sep 19, 2018
07:39 AM
Awesome, thanks for all the info guys. One last question I pose. If you guys where in the same situation working with this padded 2K anamorphic material, and you were cutting an ad for broadcast, and also where going to run it on web as well. How would you proceed? Would nest the 2k anamorphic sequence into a 1080 comp and apply a 2.39 mask over the top? Or would you confirm the footage to a anamorphic sequence, that had the appropriate 2.39 aspect ratio, and upon export choose 1920x1090 and scale to fit, so that you end up with a 16x9 export with the appropriate bars top and bottom or lastly would you just export the video with a true 2.39 aspect ratio and deliver that to stations and web, not sure if the web and broadcast stations automatically scale to fit the 16x9 screens.
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
07:02 PM
Also, looking to end up with 16x9 final export...but cropped to appear the way it was shot, so it would 16x9 but letter boxed, if that makes sense.
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
07:00 PM
Ah, I see. Guess I was wondering what the industry standard workflow is when dealing with this 2K, 2944 x 2160 anamorphic footage shot on the alexa mini, when delivering for broadcast at 1080p. Maybe there isn't one? From what I gather, it's pretty much up to me to determine how the end product should be cropped within the 1080 comp.
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
06:39 PM
I guess what I'm asking is, should I just scale the native clips to fit the 1080 comp, and just apply the 2.39 matte over the top? Just feels like strange workflow. Just don't understand why the clips don't desqueeze to automatically fit the 2.39 crop. The extra step is annoying.
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
04:56 PM
Thanks Neil, appreciate the response! That being said, in the below reference you'll see an image of a 1080 comp. The red matte represents a 2.39 letterbox matte, I think like you were mentioning some editors using, it's just colored red for this demonstration. The video you see is at native pixel dimensions, set to to fit the 1080 comp. I personally don't mind the slightly narrower crop. But I'm guessing it's not best practice to keep the crop that way, but rather scale it up to fit the broader 2.39 mask? I guess I don't understand why the native dimensions are not made to fit the 2.39 crop, if that's the crop that people want to see as the end result. Any thoughts?
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
04:54 PM
Thanks Neil, appreciate the response! That being said, in the below reference you'll see an image of a 1080 comp. The red matte represents a 2.39 letterbox matte, I think like you were mentioning some editors using, it's just colored red for this demonstration. The video you see is at native pixel dimensions, set to to fit the 1080 comp. I personally don't mind the slightly narrower crop. But I'm guessing it's not best practice to keep the crop that way, but rather scale it up to fit the broader 2.39 mask? I guess I don't understand why the native dimensions are not made to fit the 2.39 crop, if that's the crop that people want to see as the end result. Any thoughts?
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
03:34 PM
The footage is already de-squeezed. I don't need to do it. I'm just trying to determine the proper sequence settings to edit my picture in,taking in consideration I'll be delivering for broadcast at 1080. I want to make sure I'm framing the footage correctly etc. and getting the most out the native framing and how it was intended to be viewed.
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
02:10 PM
Ah, so that sort of gets to my other question. Is 2048 x 848 the aspect ratio I should be editing these clips in? I had been editing them in the native 2994 x 2160 sequence, and then scaling them up slightly to get rid of the padding left and right. Editing in a 2048 x 848 sequences, I'd obviously need to scale and adjust the clips a bit more to fit. And exporting out a 2994 x 2160 edit at 1080 vs Exporting out a 2048 x 848 edit at 1080 is going to look different obviously. The former, having a slightly thinner letter box. I don't know which is correct. Picture attached for reference. The red area indicates a classic 2.39 letterbox area. The video you see in the frame is the full 2994 x 2160 (scaled to get rid of the padding) dropped into the 1080 comp. (white box added to protect the innocent)
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
01:48 PM
So, for you would that mean taking the 2944 x 2160 clips and scale them down to fit the 1080 comp?
... View more
‎Sep 18, 2018
09:23 AM
Hey guys, I'm editing some Arri Anamorphic 2k footage, aspect ratio is 2944 x 2160. If you're familiar with this ratio, you know that once you desqueeze the footage and bring the clips into Premiere, it has extra black padding on the left and right. What is the proper sequence settings / dimensions I should be editing this footage in? Here are some options I've come across on message boards: 1) Edit in the native sequence, 2944 x 2160 and scale up the clips to eliminate the extra padding. 2) Edit in 2880 x 2160, no scaling required. 3) Edit in a 2048 x 858 sequence, and scale the clips to fit My final delivery will be in 1080p, by the way. So, I'd like to edit everything in the high res sequences, lay graphics over the top etc. and then export out at 1080p, unless that's not the best way. Would love to hear suggestions. Thank you, and sincerely appreciate any help I can get.
... View more
‎Sep 03, 2018
05:18 PM
Hey guys, I'm working on a 30 sec edit for television delivery and I'm trying to figure out the proper work flow for these anamorphic clips I have. The clips I have are - 2944 x 2160, Apple Pro Res 4444. I believe they were shot on an ALEXA. I want to deliver in 1080p, and obviously maintain the proper anamorphic look. My typical workflow is usually: -Picture edit, color correction, audio mix within Premiere Pro. -bring a master export into After Effects to lay in effects and text, if needed. What kind of sequence should I be editing these clips in, knowing that my final deliver will be 1080?
... View more
Copyright © 2025 Adobe. All rights reserved.
AdChoices