Skip to main content
Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
Rikk Flohr_PhotographyCommunity Manager
Community Manager
May 23, 2025
Sticky

P: Introducing the Project Indigo camera app

  • May 23, 2025
  • 361 replies
  • 232530 views

This post applies to the Project Indigo iOS camera app. 

 

Adobe Labs is excited to share an early look at Project Indigo, an iPhone camera app we've started to develop, to get feedback from the photography community. The app offers full manual controls, a more natural ("SLR-like") look, and high image quality in both JPEG and raw formats. It also introduces some new photographic experiences not available in other camera apps. For more information on the underlying technology, please refer to this Project Indigo blog post.

 

Before you start with Project Indigo 

  • We recommend using Project Indigo on iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max or newer devices.
    (Also supported are 12 Pro/Pro Max, 13 Pro/Pro Max, and all 14-series devices.)
  • You should have at least 1GB of storage space left for the app, the downloadable AI Models inside the app, and for captured photos. 

 

Recipes for success when using Project Indigo 

To get the maximum out of your images captured with the app, follow these guidelines: 

  • When reviewing the results, focus on Project Indigo's more natural look (in both SDR and HDR). If you haven’t done this before, try viewing the images on your laptop or desktop device, preferably on an HDR screen. 
  • Capture with both JPEG and raw DNGs with file saving enabled. Project Indigo produces computational photography DNG files, which have the same natural look as JPEG images, but much more latitude for editing after capture. 
  • Take control of the camera with the built-in Pro Controls, including controls that are exclusive to a computational camera: Frames to Merge and Merge Method. These may be intimidating for beginners, but with Project Indigo, you can try them for free, and nothing will break—you can always reset the settings to ‘Auto’ and let the camera take back control. 
  • Go to the Indigo Labs page and play with the latest innovations our team can offer. These are only available on mobile via Indigo! 
  • Be patient! Project Indigo is doing a lot of heavy lifting under the hood, and it will reward you with great photos. In return, it may ask you for a bit of time to set up captures when needed, and to wait a few seconds for the image processing to finish. 

 

Sending feedback 

Please try the app and share feedback in this community forum thread. If you report a problem you encountered, it would help to include details like which device you are running Project Indigo on, what kind of scene you were trying to capture, what you were trying to achieve with the camera, and as much information as possible about what you like or do not like about the resulting photo quality. Our team will continually monitor this thread to track issues and improve future experiences.  

 

To improve the performance and results of Project Indigo, it is important that examples of images that do not meet your expectations are forwarded to the team via your report.  A large variety of file formats are allowed as attachments in these forum posts. The best option is to attach your image's raw file directly to your feedback post. Note that there is a 50 MB limit on an attachment's file size. If your raw file is too large to attach, the best option is to share the file via a file-sharing service (Dropbox or similar) and then share the link in your feedback post. Thank you for continuing to provide feedback on the Project Indigo camera! 

 

Boris Ajdin: Product Manager, NextCam 
 
Posted by: 

 

      361 replies

      Show previous replies
      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 30, 2026

      This is a crop of tele due to privacy, Camac vs Indigo.  Pay attention to the hair of Indigo, it is crushed shadows and Camac has strands details.

       

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/f3bq3c0rzvf3pbdwkknms/IMG_2853.png?rlkey=t1gvpt1e0vjg1n7hut5pv31ir&st=aq7lbs17&dl=0

       

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1kqxw8p460pu4m1itmmp9/IMG_2854.png?rlkey=iqsn0qxc3mri033lpb50ibury&st=070puzxf&dl=0

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 30, 2026

      This is indoor and also have white balance issue in Indigo, this time if you hit reset to “all” in LRM, it isn’t proper wb.  Also it’s very underexposed.  The camac dng and jpeg output is correct white balance and expo!

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 29, 2026

      Here is another set with white balance issue in both Indigo dng and sooc jpeg.  I am pretty confident it has to do with LTM from the AI models because if you reset in LRM to “all”, it becomes normal as how the eyes sees!

      Camac vs Indigo, this time Camac is using SR (super res mode as the dev called it, with 12 frames stacking).

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 29, 2026

      ​@BorisTheBlade This set shows Camac, Indigo, and stock.  All 3 has incorrect white balance, but Camac is the closest.  I have included the proper raw to jpeg of Indigo to represent the true scene that my eyes sees and it’s settings.

      Indigo raw processed: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9sejd5m648hjmi6v7agxo/IMG_2666.jpeg?rlkey=3pbuee0hkkjh4qxhebw7dj90c&st=waqdznq4&dl=0  This has no LTM of Indigo, I hit reset to all in LRM.

      Settings used:

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ka1oc8lzhbfcse8w8ho94/IMG_2667.png?rlkey=muhp7w7apmkakhhnys6o2x7yf&st=fl5kf53w&dl=0
       

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/immi8u4wl0hrf3g8eeehx/IMG_2668.png?rlkey=6kh8ricjqaops6whahufvdctx&st=sdldd7yp&dl=0


      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/lo1c9ddopaskf1qix7opo/IMG_2669.png?rlkey=r19snpxo6yjccwg7uzjuon7t2&st=1eh866aw&dl=0

       

      IMG_2663 dng is Indigo’s raw exported as is, nothing touched.  The bright, oversharpened, warm one is obviously stock.  Rest are Camac’s jpeg, dng, and Indigo’s SOOC jpeg.  Also PLEASE take a close look at how Indigo’s jpeg is heavily heavily crushed black shadows to the point it can’t see the metal beam on the upper left corner where the AC return air duct is.  The processed raw to jpeg show proper shadow, but with a lot of noises due to 0 denoising applied.  Stock is also crushed but not as bad as Indigo, while Camac’s jpeg is hazy and quite underexposed.

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 29, 2026

      ​@BorisTheBlade here is that comparison made before with the couch pillow patterns.  Camac vs Indigo, main lens, all auto as usual.  If you take both raws to LRM, remove sharpness and denoise, you will see that Camac has more details at max crop and show more correct patterns on the pillows.  I def know Indigo can render this on same level as Camac or greater, and we can’t blame full res downsampling either because Camac do not have access to it!  (Eventhough I did mention that downsampling was turned off in the modded google camera apk).

      There is also some very very unflattering shadow noise if shadows are lifted versus Camac using same values in LRM.  As you can see, Camac even had a expo increase( to make overall image comparible bc its raw is very dim) and shadows are still clean and definitely much much more cleaner than Indigo.

      Looking forward to the new apk pipeline redo, and hopefully less “AI” used.

       

      PS… the site update now limits screenshot png file to only 5mb!  iOS screenshots are much much bigger, no idea why.

       

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/07mss5vgh7vcuucrungjz/IMG_2652.png?rlkey=csuuqsduqqdmhav7owdbjx8vu&st=r4654ewx&dl=0

       

      https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3fxcy5w3ainfhfvb6faxz/IMG_2655.png?rlkey=b8b6lghha9av6ye9v2h34h0xa&st=dyuawjhw&dl=0
       

      The screenshot from LRM showed both using HDR edit function as well.

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 29, 2026

      ​@BorisTheBlade seems like raw dng upload works!  Here’s a comparison using the main lens and tele lens of Camac app vs Indigo app.  Both are latest, all auto, Indigo’s raw was exported as is using LRM so no additional process was made.  

       

      If you import both Camac’s raw and Indigo’s raw to LRM or any editing app, set all sharpening and denoising to 0, you will see Camac’s app retain much much more details and true sharpness than Indigo.  Indigo still has that weird blur(softness) to it like there’s still some denoising applied even though you did mention that it’s true raw(nothing processed).  This could be a problem elsewhere aside that I am not an expert of.  Perhaps this has something to do with the high frequency rendering that you mentioned Indigo is still “working on”.

       

      From speaking with Camac’s developer, his auto mode which is labeled as 16EV, stacks 3 frames.  I don’t know how much frames Indigo did but Google Camera default stacking is 6 frames and it’s not as blur(soft) as how Indigo’s raw look.

       

      Please take a look into this, especially these sample set. 

      harvasyuk
      harvasyuk
      Participant
      February 4, 2026

      About the sharpness:

      What I noticed both with 16 pro and 17 pro - all of RAW photos that came out of sensors that do pixel bining, somehow look soft and oversharpened at the same time. I’m talking about true single-frame RAW dng files that most third-party camera apps do, all the Lightroom sharpening/noise sliders at 0.

       

      I used 16 pro for about 6 months - all the telephoto RAW shots looked perfectly natural and slightly soft (something like my old Pixel 5 was producing). There was no signs of artifficial sharpness or anything that would make me think that the photo is processed.

       

      With 17 pro I started noticing that telephoto RAW shots look like they’re slightly oversharpened - similar to what the main sensor is doing. This is mostly noticeable in the trees when taking photos of the landscapes. Especially during the winter.

       

      Both 16 pro and 17 pro produce horrible RAW pictures with the wide and ultrawide modules. Lots of artefacts: the purple tint around small details, like wires and trees. And also the overshapened look while actually being soft at the same time (this is really weird).

       

      I was a bit surprised when I compared the two RAWs of the main module (single-frame true bayer RAW) from Pixel 7 and 17 pro. Pixel 7 looks much more natural. Somehow there’s slightly less noise, more details and no artefacts like color fringing or anything that would give away the pixel-binning sensor.

       

      Project Indigo makes iphone RAWs better overall. Most of the time RAWs are okay. I appreciate the good SNR thanks to stacking. But the generated jpegs are too processed. There’s too much noise reduction, contrast, saturation and sharpening. So, I only use Indigor for taking RAWs.

       

      I’d say that the strange RAW results on iphone is Apple’s issue. And, unfortunately, it seems like they are not going to do anything with that.

      Would be awesome if they allowed third parties taking full sensor 48mp RAW. But I guess that’s also not going to happen because it’s Apple and they always have some weird reason for such decisions.

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 27, 2026

      ​@BorisTheBlade here is a comparison of Camac app latest version vs Indigo’s latest version.  Both were shot auto, no tap, raw was processed via LRM with sharpness and denoising set to 0, and Indigo resetting to all to remove the LTM.

      Camac: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tnk4dsz1bkryfao25h75c/IMG_2619.jpeg?rlkey=h7iojmjfsfkfa7rus4msdu0hi&st=hbnmn816&dl=0

       

      Indigo: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2w9vij34ribyozbflo62j/IMG_2621.jpeg?rlkey=6ye4jl9iha8wc1zcrzyqaq87c&st=fm64sxyx&dl=0

       

      As you can see, the Camac app output is much better defined in details versus Indigo.  I will use this app to compare versus Indigo now instead of stock to have a baseline on processing issues of artifacts, or just to show what is lacking.

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 27, 2026

      ​@BorisTheBlade I see the new forum format has been updated, and I don’t know if it’s for the best or worst because now you don’t have access to the last page (or page designation), all it does is show “show more replies” which will take forever to get to the latest replies!  Unless I’m missing something here.

      D
      default0i09akcya5ak
      Participating Frequently
      January 28, 2026

      In Adobe’s continual effort to hate customers/users we need to click on the ‘read previous’ to see the latest posts. 

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      January 28, 2026

      I dont even see that option…

      T
      T__L
      Participating Frequently
      November 20, 2025

      When can we expect the next release? It's been 3 weeks since the last update for the iPhone 17's.

       

      The lack of updates is really off-putting... We understand there's a smaller team working on this app, but how else is the app going to improve without more updates so that we can provide more feedback?

      N
      nnhuy
      Participating Frequently
      November 18, 2025

      @BorisTheBlade Hello, I posted here a couple months ago asking about dramatically different saturation levels between the SDR and HDR looks, especially in shots with skies and clouds. I wasn't able to provide .DNGs back then, but now here is a shared folder of several different shots in .DNG+.JPG further demonstrating the problem. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WFa2mTelBAp9VVWXIg4lVGCOvenyRrUj?usp=sharing

       

      Again, I don't have an opinion on which look is correct. I just do not want there to be drastic changes in image "feel" when switching between SDR and HDR, especially because iOS/MacOS will also freely swap between variants with changing low-power-mode, ambient lighting, etc.

      C
      Capture66
      Participant
      November 19, 2025

      I switched from a 15 Pro to a 17 Pro and I can confirm that the results are clearly more hit & miss with the 17P. This is about the JPEG output only. WB completely off for no apparent reason (on auto) and a occasional 'over the top' HDR effect. On the 15P Pi's output was more consistant. 

      Using Pi for a few weeks now, I'm amazed how stunning the images can look. That said, comparing shots from the Apple app, Pi and the real life scene, it seems that Pi leans towards 'bigger than life' tone and colour rendering. To me the images often look more saturated, vibrant and more contrasty/dramatic than the scene in front of the camera. Gorgeous without question but not necessarily accurate. Or is that just me? (again, this is about the JPEG output)

      N
      nhan_8084
      Participating Frequently
      November 19, 2025
      Thanks for confirming what I have been saying as well on my 17 Pro Max to
      let the team knows it’s not just me or personal preference! The more
      reports like these, the devs will realize there’s really issue with JPEG
      outputs and needs fixing asap!
      Show more replies
      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices