Another Poor Quality AI Image (NOT LABELED AS AI)

Hello @BrickelleM, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report.

@Contributor1 

Instead of making a new thread I'm going to continue here.

This account is generating assets with AI and then using Image Trace to vectorize them and not marking them as AI.
https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211738588/nobel

Examples:
https://stock.adobe.com/images/computer-keyboard-with-stationery-headphones/800047246
look at the feet https://stock.adobe.com/images/successful-startup-team-collaborating-and-planning/794832452
look at the eyes https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211738588/nobel?asset_id=789991989
arm https://stock.adobe.com/images/calm-woman-relaxing-and-drinking-coffee-peaceful/788301605?prev_url=detail
feet https://stock.adobe.com/images/man-woman-and-cat-sitting-on-the-sofa-with-laptops-v/789996385?prev_url=detail

So on and so forth. I think that they should still be marked as AI generated even though they've been vectorized. It's misleading.

I don't know why they take 3 months of reviewing

Seriously!! Who is approving this stuff!? 

Happy Mather's Daay? And I thought Happy Pather's ay couldn't be beat. 

@Contributor1 

Another one: https://stock.adobe.com/images/a-mother-s-day-greeting-with-a-circular-text-area-saying-happy-mother-s-day-surrounded-by-a-wreath-of-stylized-pink-and-red-flowers-with-green-leaves-on-a-dotted-beige-background/787036976

And if you go to this indivdual's start page and scroll down, there seems to be a major problem similars that are said to be seamless in the title. The seams is close, but not close enough.