Skip to main content
G
GraphicsRaptor
Participant
February 2, 2024

Artist not labeling thier images as Gen AI

  • February 2, 2024
  • 4 replies
  • 475 views

This artist is taking ai generated images and throwing them in live trace and calling it a day. There are major issue with extra fingers an such. How are these vector images passing quality control? for example they are not marking their stock as AI gen nor bothering to fix errors. thier galley is filled with this. How is this considered acceptable quality?!

 

https://stock.adobe.com/images/collection-of-vector-color-dinosaur/570027230?prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/images/a-cool-dinosaur-on-a-skateboard/570027205?prev_url=detail

 

Gpbolde photos, images, assets | Adobe Stock

This topic has been closed for replies.

4 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity Expert
Community Expert
March 9, 2024

@Matsam77,

They are noted. As they are entered in the Adobe bug report system, there should also be a follow-up.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
M
Matsam77
Known Participant
March 9, 2024

So pretty much everything I see reported here, is not dealt with.
Do Adobe really care about the quality of their assets and customer experience? More than 1 month that this guy reported and no action has been taken.
I love AI images and seeing all the benefits it brings to Adobe stock, but bad AI that gets through moderation and reported here should be dealt with. This is ridiculous.

C
Community Manager
Contributor1Community Manager
Community Manager
February 3, 2024

Hello @GraphicsRaptor, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the vector quality

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity Expert
Community Expert
February 2, 2024

It isn't acceptable quality, and I'm sure that there will be consequences for these assets, as soon as Adobe has a second look at them. Not all contributors read or respect the requirements. This one started submitting generative AI vector assets before it was allowed to do so. In addition, the asset moderation did a poor job on those. It's not good, customers are losing their time searching for good assets, but it happens, unfortunately.

 

I suppose, @Contributor1 want's to submit this to his team for a second look.

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices