Is Adobe going to do something about mislabeled AI?

Hi @22318168, I've sent the details of 1596029181, 1848919143, 1854691033, 1837959304, 1854667456, 1586012959 to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the images.

@22318168 ,

I tagged Contributor1 who will initiate the checking. 

@daniellei4510 ,

You can check the upload dates by checking your file IDs and comparing them to these here. 

I'm not an expert on asset numbers, but it's possible this was submitted early on when Adobe began accepting AI, during which time this problem may have occurred more often and when AI slop was being accepted left and right before Adobe implemented some retraining. Once an asset is reported, it's possible they will take a deeper dive into the contributor's entire account to determine if this was a one-off or of multiple assets were not marked properly.

Sorry to double comment—they all flag for Google SynthID, which is supposed to be like a digital stamp and therefore accurate as far as I'm aware. Shouldn't the approval process include a check for this?

@Abambo @daniellei4510 image 1 and 3 are animals that don't exist, which can be confirmed using reverse image search. Image 2 is my bad, the smoothing threw me off. I've included better examples below. 

So there will be no simple option to report these assets for a re-inspection? For some queries it's now so common that a quick button click option is kind of needed. 

https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-parrot-with-colorful-plumage-stands-looking-ahead-on-a-clean-empty-background/1854691033

https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-parrot-in-flight-with-open-wings-colorful-feathers-and-a-black-beak-on-display/1837959304

https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-colorful-lovebird-in-flight-with-its-wings-out-against-a-neutral-background/1854667456

https://stock.adobe.com/es/images/isolated-vivid-red-macaw-parrot-in-flight/1586012959

Not a parrot expert either, but the feet look wrong. I ran it through a fairy accurate image detector and it was reported to be 99% AI, probably Midjourney.

You should repost the link to your last one in the same manner you did with the two first ones. The way to report assets is to post links to the assets or the file id here.

Your second asset:

I'm not a parrot expert, so what lets you think that they are generative AI? If it's fake, it's not that obvious for a non-parrot expert, but yes, it shows elements that could be AI generated and a small test identifies it as AI generated.  

In addition it is a low quality asset.

@Contributor1 ?