Skip to main content
Participant
June 9, 2024

Is there a way to report AI generated content being passed off as actual photos?

  • June 9, 2024
  • 17 replies
  • 1530 views

I'm just looking for images I can use as general anatomy practice while drawing, and I found this abomination (file number 677462298). I always exclude AI generated images and look for photos, and I immediately knew it was AI because horses do not move like that. It's a biomechanical impossibility. There is no option to report trash like this on the preview page, I looked through the support pages, and the only directions I got from Google - which, btw, are better than what your site gave me, Adobe - were to the forums. Now, I'd've much rather have just submitted a report and called it good, but you left me with no other option than going public with my grievances. Do better, Adobe.

17 replies

Participant
November 21, 2025

Adobe quite obviously has no interest whatsoever to include a "GenAI reporting option" seeing how far this spans back and it still isn't implemented. This feels too much like deterrence as the sole thing you can rely on is that no professional has the nerves or time to go to the community to copy and paste URLs in here so someone will eventually react.

We will have to wait for some lawsuits following the EU AI Act as companies will not accept being held responsible for not marking AI generated content that they unknowingly bought from Adobe.

Community Manager
February 1, 2025

Hello @37399144g3ef, I've sent the details of video 584807077 missing a GenAI tag to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the video.

Participating Frequently
February 1, 2025
Participant
January 9, 2025

Not quite Pandora's Box unfortunately. At least the last thing out that box was hope— seems as though we can't even be afforded that. Does anyone know of any stock sites with a zero tolerance policy for AI generated images?

Legend
January 9, 2025

I'm afraid Adobe has opened Pandora's Box.

Community Manager
January 9, 2025

Hello @37399144g3ef, I've sent the details of video 610467421 missing a GenAI tag to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the video.

Participating Frequently
January 8, 2025
Community Manager
December 9, 2024

Hello @DylanRidley, I've sent these details to be reviewed internally. Hello @37399144g3ef, yes tagging in these threads currently the best method for Users to flag. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

Participating Frequently
December 9, 2024

Even the example Dylan referenced ( 827596544 ) is a User title "AI-Stocks". Generally it looks like they have labeled their content AI but things like this are getting missed and falling through the cracks. 

@Contributor1 for visibility, again I think the idea is if there's AI content it needs to be tagged properly. Can you maybe give us some guidance here? Or is tagging in these threads currently the best method for Users to flag?


Participant
December 9, 2024

More here 827596544 

This is quite honestly ridiculous, if Adobe are happy for AI "artists" to fill their site with 100 pages of AI generated garbage we need to at least be able to easily report people that aren't tagging it properly. Its only going to get harder to spot AI images and I don't want to be supporting someone typing a sentence into AI then trying to pass it off as human work instead of artists who put actual passion into their craft.