Re: AI generated images

@daniellei4510 ,

Nobody complained until now.

That set of images showed up a few months ago. I'm surprised they're still available.

The answer is not to tag or exclude AI images from searches; the answer is to review images before they are posted. Have a look at #583461015. How can Adobe charge for that that image?  Shame on them.

By @David34119419tp47

Tagging is one problem, bad assets are a second one. Contributors are currently complaining that they get more refusals, so hopefully, Adobe's moderators are doing a better job with sorting out flawed assets at the beginning. 

I find it also very dishonest from contributors to submit assets with highly visible defects, and then hoping that the moderator would let them pass. This is bad for all of us, who invest considerable time in cleaning up our assets to give buyers a good experience and trust in the system. 

Let's get @Contributor1 checking this. I think, this entire series need to go. And I've seen multiple other assets that should be checked again. And this contributor has 38 pages of assets. That's work ahead.

Indeed that image is a mess....