Reporting AI Images That Haven't Been Labeled As Such

Hey Adobe, can we please get a more formal system for reporting Ai images? Its exhausting having to use other software to check the images we download. Example right here:
https://stock.adobe.com/images/glossy-juicy-dill-pickle-close-up/1489256671

In my 12 years as an art director for food photography, never have I seen a pickle like this. How do we stop this rampant problem?

How is this the standard procedure to mark non-labeled AI generated images? I stumble upon dozens of these when trying to find stock footage. Should I open a new discussion in the community board everytime? What kind of paperwork deterrent is that supposed to be? 

My coworker unknowingly just used an AI-generated picture for a customers homepage. We are by law obliged to mark AI generated pictures - but how could we if we aren't aware? And how can we prevent that from happening if there is no simple process to flag those pictures? 

Perhaps @Contributor1 can have the moderation team take a look at this one.

I'm designing an aquarium. I need realistic, biologically accurate images. If I accidentally put an AI generated image into a presentation, this reflects poorly on me. And ultimately reflects poorly on adobe. Sure there is a place for AI generated images/videos. But some of us really need to be able to filter those out. Here is an example of a video not filtered by "exclude generative AI" that is definitely AI:

https://stock.adobe.com/video/sea-anglerfish-not-in-a-predatory-stance-but-floating-serenely-in-the-abyssal-darkness-emphasize-the-soft-ethereal-glow-illuminating-the-surrounding-particles-of-marine-snow-creating-a-lonely-yet/1462249742

This kind of thing just wastes my time and makes it harder to find what I actually need. Hopefully Adobe will actually try to fix this problem.

I also found yet another contributor who is not labelling images as generative Ai even though they obviously are. Marketing department picked an image I had to work with that is obviously generative Ai (dead giveaways - Absolute poor path work, artifacting, details fall apart upon closer inspection, etc. Just like other generative Ai vectors.) Looking at the contributors portfolio some are labeled as Ai but not all. Portfolio is also a dead giveaway with all the similar iterations. 

Image: https://stock.adobe.com/images/beautiful-autumn-mountain-landscape-amazing-landscape-of-snowy-mountains-and-night-forest-psychedelic-nature-vector-illustration-background/696181789

Contributor's portfolio https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211732338/rousan?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

It would be great if there was some form of curating for new images being added to Adobe Stock and a simpler way to report images/contributor since this appears to be a pretty common problem and is only getting worse. Trusting the contributors is not working. Besides there cannot be a large market of people specifically looking for generative Ai when it can be easily done and for little to no cost done by the person searching themselves.