Suspect AI-generated images

3 replies
97 views
Translate

Contributor profile: https://stock.adobe.com/ru/contributor/212428229/sxcd

Only a few images from the portfolio are labled as AI-generated, although other images from the same collection are not labled as AI-generated.

All images are low resolution, making it harder to detect AI artifacts.

Suspected images:

2006794934 (number 10 after 8 on the plastic ruler)
2006794055 (there should be less tape on one side)

2006794154 (position of the second eagle’s head)

1893789484 (11 holes on the disc instead of 10)

Given these examples, I suspect most of the portfolio

C

Contributor1

Community Manager

Hello @Peter+Bridgerton, I've sent the details of your report to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

For a refund/credit return please reach out to our customer care team below:

Adobe customer care can be contacted by beginning a secure chat session at https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html?rghtup=autoOpen. Pop-up blockers need to be disabled! If the chat window fails to open, or is non-responsive, use a different device to start the interaction. Also, if you don’t see the chat feature you may need to accept all adobe cookies.

Translate

U

UfgPr

Inspiring

The portfolio is still online. All images are just above the 4 MP Adobe threshold. Why would someone with great effort create such cinematic looking images of historic stuff in different locations with a real camera and then upload only 4 MP results and thus artificially limit the usability? And why would a photographer invest a lot of time in setting up such scenes to then only upload one perspective? That smells…but I think since we only see the thumbnails, only Adobe can investigate.

Translate