biracial couples

This solution does work!

Id say its still technically a bug though since the AI bias cant generate what im asking for even though i can create it

The other possibility, which I did not try in this case, is to take one of these into generative fill and select the male and say "asian man" and see if it will convert the person there.

sorry the prompt on the last one was (biracial couple)(woman-caucasian)(man-asian)

I appreciate the feedback. The hyphenated and bracketted part makes sense, but the syntax in the second part was hard to grasp and seemed to be a zero sum game for my ethnicities. Im assuming that because of the lack of data to pull from, a caucasian woman with an asian man is hard to end up with since its not culturally common.

So i tried messing with the syntax a bit also


To no avail.

I presume your experience with "biracial couple" treated those words as separate concepts, not as a single concept. In English, "biracial couple" can mean two things: a couple where both people are biracial, or a couple where each person is a different race. The first meaning binds the words more closely together than the second. In interpreting a prompt, assume that the model will interpret them in the LEAST coupled way (which is why saying "no stairs" frequently causes stairs to appear). In this scenario, it would generate two people who are both biracial.

I have found hyphenating two different words can seem to link them where separating with a space can make FF think they are two separate concepts. This is not guaranteed.  Sometimes it seems to have a 25-50% effective rate (1-2 photos get what you want, but that is better than 0%).

I have also found that specifying specific races gets better results than just "biracial".

(Biracial-couple) Caucasian black woman man 

I found that if you include the word "biracial", each person is of mixed race, rather than one asian and one black.