P: Show words omitted from prompt or violates content guidelines

Many, many of us are right on that line. Adobe has gone completely insane. They should be sued by their shareholders because of exactly what you describe. Censorship taken to the point of clinical insanity. Adobe doubled its price but now hurts us financially due to ramptant, illogical wokeism. It's amazing. The stupidity is the stuff of legends.

No, it helps not at all. If it's in Websters, the word is fair game. It's part of the English language. If woke Adobe wants to create some new language that it thinks it can persuade people to use, go for it. Otherwise, let us use the language we've used for a thousand years.

It is absolutely amazing how woke Adobe is and how much control they choose to have over artistic expression.  Art has often been offensive. Expression is not about making sure everyone about you is comfortable.  What makes it even worse is having the leash so tight that we can't even do innocuous things.  Another example.  I wanted to do a piece with a Shogun in a dramatic, dynamic pose, with the bushido code in the background and random blood splatters on the background, and EXTREMELY common motiff in that genre of art.  We won't even focus on the fact that for some reason, adobe doesn't like it's AI to generate feet, unless you specify feet and then you still get a portrait with a foot growing out of someone's shoulder... But anyway, Shogun was a no go!  I'm sure because it has the word GUN in it. Blood was not allowed. And for some reason, BUSHIDO was not allowed!  Come on, and the best Adobe does is give us a canned response "thank you for your suggestion. our goal is to provide a safe and enjoyable .......blah blah blah...use the thumbs.... blah blah blah"  Guess what, it's NOT enjoyable.  It's hard enough to get an image just the way you want it without the censorship. This just makes it ridiculous from a workflow standpoint let alone the principle of being stifled. 

"Safe" environment? What are we two year olds? We are attempting to make art, here, not be censored by malcontents behind the scenes. Maybe "words" trigger you, but the rest of us are just looking at them as images in an art piece. I believe Adobe and its behind the scenes operators and moderators should have the respect and courtesy to publish a list of prohibited terms up front and proudly. Then we users can know exactly what we can and cannot do on Firefly. Thank you.

Been a die hard Adobe user and acvocate for over 30 years.  Firefly seemed like it was going to be a great option for helping me add props to backgrounds in my photos.  I love to use practical effects and real props. But it's not always possible. So, AI to the rescue.  or not.  I'm a product photographer . One of my biggest clients is in the firearm industry.  I was working on a tribute to America's veterans and their familiies. Adobe won't let me add a bullet or a shotgun shell, or a rifle sling, or a grenade, or even an ammo can.  I'm done with Adobe. I cancelled my subscriptions today

I got censored typing in heart surgery, eye surgery, sexy woman giving cpr to a bear.... it's incredible.  I will give up soon.

We pay for the service(s) there should be no censoring. Adobe's paying customers are not people under the age of 16. 

😮 - 4 O's in this emoji.

On a serious note, perhaps Adobe can introduce prompts on how to rewrite gens that its engine deems "O-ffensive"?

mj

iMSD

O ring by itself was deemed in violation. An o ring! Maybe I ought to tell NASA and my local hardware store that this an ofensive term, and to censor it. "The Space Shuttle Chalanger, exploded shortly after lift-off due a faulty $*&^*. My hose leaks due to worn *&$*%.

I absolutely agree. If I wan't to make a realistic picture of humanoid female creture in the buff... than by golly I ought to be able to do that!