P: Show words omitted from prompt or violates content guidelines

Your answer does nothing to answer my question. I added a photo that "violated community standards" and I want to know WHY! I really don't think this violates any reasonable community standards. Please LOOK at the photo I uploaded and tell my why it violates community standards. I'd be happy to upload it again if necessary.

John
jgerecht@comcast.net

Hello @John Gerecht,

Thank you for the suggestion. Our goal is to provide all our users with a safe and enjoyable experience. We realize our filters may be considered too strict for some users and are investigating ways to improve this experience. Please use the thumbs up/thumbs down buttons to provide feedback on images or use the blue "Share Feedback" button to let us know if a prompt was incorrectly blocked. (Merging all similar threads here so the team can access all requests on this issue.)

Thanks,

Anubhav

Apparently, no, we are not safe from being banned, and when it happens there is no notification, or explanation from anyone. My beta version stopped working a few weeks ago but I wasn't sure why. I was able to sign up under an old Adobe ID but I'm not a CC customer on that account. When the app went live, I was asked to buy credits on the old account. Went to the other account where I pay for CC and when I went to Firefly I got an error about it not being available in my region (Georgia, USA) but after using CHAT the representative told me my access had been rovoked for violating the terms of use and that I probably used some inappropriate words. I was very disappointed at how this was handled. I have appealed to get access back. I've used Adobe products for more than 25 years.

If you want to control what you do with AI and be creative with it, you need an open-source app installed on your machine.

Ha ha. Indeed.

Fully one third of my attempts to create images in firefly result in absurd, ultra-woke, deranged, politically correct censorship. And that's using words as innocuous as yours. It looks as though a few Millennials at Adobe found themselves with some unexpected POWER in making up the banned list and they have gone stark raving mad with it. There are 171,000 words in the English language. I think Adobe thinks 162,000 of them are obscene. What sheltered lives they must have lead. It's time their shareholders revolted because they are NOT being represented sanely. This is ludicrous. No way on earth I would pay for this.

I agree. 

If Adobe doesn't remove these silly guidline violations they will bet left behind in the AI image generation race. There are already other alternative were you can get the result you want without having to tip toe thru Adobes dictionary. 

For mine specifically, I think the name "Audrey Hepburn" was the issue. 😕😕

Modi and Rahul Gandhi fighting