Skip to main content
TVWxMan
Known Participant
February 9, 2021

P: Noise Reduction not available for S21

  • February 9, 2021
  • 30 replies
  • 1749 views

When using my brand new Galaxy S21 Ultra in Pro Mode and importing raw DNG images into Lightroom Classic 10.1.1 the Noise Reduction module does not work at all.  (Other basics do, such as exposure, saturation, etc.)  Yet, my DNG files from my prior Galaxy S20 Ultra do just fine in Lightroom along with DNG files from other devices such as my drone.  This problem was duplicated and verified by another user in the Lightroom Classic forum.

 

Footnote:  I also received this error message when attempting to upload this image to the Adobe Support Community - Lightroom Classic forum.  

 

  • The attachment's 20210205_235657.dng content type (image/DNG) does not match its file extension and has been removed.

 

 

This topic has been closed for replies.

30 replies

Participant
February 20, 2021

Thanks 

It worked fine for samsung s10+ DNG files

This issue first appeared with camera raw 12.4 and now 13

It's gone unnoticed 

Known Participant
February 20, 2021

Same for the S21 Ultra on Windows 10 with Lightroom Classic V10.1.1.

Go-around while waiting for a fix (has this been reported to Adobe yet?), go negative with the texture slider. At least for the S21 Ultra raw images, going negative reduces noise (as expected) but also increases sharpness. Not sure if this is a bug with the texture slider as reducing noise is a little known trick that occasionally increases (apparent?) sharpness. 

Participant
February 20, 2021

Lightroom classic > Develop > Color & Luminance Noise Reduction Module doesn't work

Lightroom classic 10.1

Adobe Raw 13.1 (658)

MacOs Catalina 10.15.7 

&

Windows 7 64 sp1

Android 11

Samsung Note 20 Ultra DNG files

TVWxMan
TVWxManAuthor
Known Participant
February 11, 2021

@bill_3305731  

Thanks Bill.  It's just frustrating as I "upgraded" from the S20 to the S21 to get the "better" camera and now I'm in far worse shape than if I had just stayed with the S20.

What's the saying?  If it ain't broke don't fix it?

 

Known Participant
February 11, 2021

Confirmed your observations with the 23MB image. None of the sliders in the Noise Reduction panel have any effect. All the sliders in the Basic, Sharpening and Transform panels work. 

 

I did find that reducing the Texture slider cleaned up the image but also increased detail so I'm suspicious that this slider is not working correctly. My experience with other images is that taking this slider negative reduces sharpness. So I guess that temporarily, this could be used for noise reduction. As this slider is just a smart combo of Luminance Noise Reduction and Sharpening, the same result can be accomplished by using these 2 sliders independently. 

Known Participant
February 10, 2021

I redownloaded it and this time it is 23MB with the exif data. As the prior image wasn't overlaid (changed the name first), I can compare and see that the first one was only 1/2MB. Tomorrow I'll load the full size image into Lightroom to see how they compare. 

Known Participant
February 10, 2021

Strange. When I extracted it to my hard drive, it was only 1/2 MB. I gave up on One Drive a couple of years ago due to all the bugs which never seemed to get fixed and switched to Google Drive. Is it possible that your upload compressed it in some way or perhaps the extract to my drive? Google Drive has 2 modes: free and fee with free compressing. Is it possible that One Drive does something similar? 

TVWxMan
TVWxManAuthor
Known Participant
February 10, 2021

Agreed, but the luminance noise reduction is typically much more aggressive.  There is no doubt it isn't responding to commands.  My other DNG files from my S20 are very responsive to the noise sliders, so much so, I typically just bump it one direction or the other to not overdo it.

TVWxMan
TVWxManAuthor
Known Participant
February 10, 2021

I'm not sure why you're not seeing the EXIF data.  When I open it in FastStone, here's what it shows, attached.

TVWxMan
TVWxManAuthor
Known Participant
February 10, 2021

Thanks for asking, they do not work at all, none of them in that section.